why aren t we talking about hillary clinton getting debate questions. that is a valid attempt to influence the election. your head was in your hands. but is that the e give lan si. of course it is. here is what we know. we know that wlaex got the information from a russian hack. we know that. spo to suggest and sean my dear friend. i ve worked for him with many, many years, to suggest that a planted question by a cnn analyst that went to secretary clinton is on the same level as trying to influence a national election, it s like me comparing for an hour. and it s like me comparing, you know i can t even come up with a comparison. it s ridiculous and laughable, but it s very, very sad. listen, sean spicer is clearly trying to spin his way out of a fundamental pr problem. we re making the argument. over cheese balls. here s the real simple
republicans on capitol hill? i think there s actually something of a crisis of faith among a lot of congressional republicans on this point. i mean, here is something that has been taken as absolute gospel for conservative national security republicans. that russia is not to be trusted. russia is not our friend, and that there is a long history of tit for tat of mutual speen and all the sudden the leader of their party, the president-elect of the united states is saying things that make them uncomfortable. and i m thinking of the john mccain and lindsey graham exactly. and they are saying so publicly that this makes them uncomfortable. what do they do with that? how certainly this hearing this week promises to be a full board investigative hearing where they will go hard at the evidence. what do they do with it afterward. what s concerning about this is that the poll in zits partisan. it has republicans and democrats. the real question is is