illegal migration built as immoral. proposed illegal migration laws. they re being debated in the upper house of parliament and would see some migrants being sent to what are described as safe third countries, such as rwanda, to have their asylum claims processed. ministers say it s the best way of deterring people from risking their lives crossing the english channel in small boats. here s archbishopjustin outlining why, in his opinion, the uk government s proposals don t tackle the long term and global nature of the problem. evenif even if this bill succeeded in temporarily stopping the boats, and i do not think it will, it will not stop conflict or climate migration. they forecasted that climate change by itself, let alone the conflicts it s already causing, will lead to at least 800 million more refugees a yearin at least 800 million more refugees a year in total by 2050. and what of other countries follow suit? the uh in sea arps believes the bill could lead to the c
in sea arps believes the bill could lead to the collapse of the international system that protects refugees. is that what we want to? the united kingdom to contribute to bnr leadership. the bbc home editor mark easton told us more about the words of the archbishop of canterbury. rare, it certainly is, but this is a bill that certainly divides politics at the moment. you have and that same debate but we saw the archbishop of canterbury, we have two very seniorformer archbishop of canterbury, we have two very senior formerjudges speak out every at the former master who basically said that the government was increasing barriers refugees and imposing them with an ultimatum with the goal of preventing all refugees coming. he very much opposed the bill be of the former supreme court judge under haywood saying that