proceed while that s happen somethi they have been a deliberative body. they were different from the house because it was more collegial. it was a consensus building situation like we saw with senator flake and coons. we have a situation where you don t need 60 votes to achieve cloture then especially for the se presu supreme court, it s going to be a total political environment. if anyone had doubts before as to whether or not the supreme court was unbiassed and independent, they re not going to believe that anymore when you have someone who is selected and then appointed and then confirmed who has a very strong bias and has a very strong bias against women. i think that came out loud and clear.
the senate, we re going to keep going on this. we re going to keep investigating this even afterthe election because we don t believe he s fit to serve on this court and they could impeach him. you say the investigation is being driven from inside fbi headquarters. help me understand how prioritization works. we were talking about limitations a moment ago. clearly things the white house counsel wasn t interested in fbi looking into. what college classmates said about his drinking or perhaps the lies or the small lies that were told by the nominee when it came to drinking on capitol hill. how does the fbi determine where to go and what paths to take? here what we have is a situation where this nominee has been investigating multiple times in his previous government jobs. there s already a wealth of information the fbi has available to it. also, over the last six or eight