specific threat to attack u.s. sovereign territory, and everybody is saying, oh, trump is out of control, he s gone too far. you say it s deranged, i say the implication is intentional. if war does break out, we re being led to believe that any conflict that happens is a result of donald trump taking office on january 20, he s bomb bass particular, suddenly nuclear weapons just appeared in the hands of north korea. he s talking smack and jong-un is motivated to attack us. what is supposed to be forgotten is the three previous administrations, whether it be clinton, bush, or obama, all of the measured rhetoric that went along with it. and the failure that happened as a result of north korea getting those nuclear weapons because appeasement and reckless costs, it s omission. sdonld trump said if anyone else said what i said, you wouldn t see the criticism of it. proof of it, secretary of
what he would say is all the people who are supposed to know everything know the policy about iran. you know, sforn policy. they say haven t come up with a better alternative or solution. so what s wrong with mine. this is at the very kwoer. he s going to go in there and get better results than at the current time. i think this was a really skbresing someday, but and we also saw tonight jeb busc hrksz really go after sdonld trump for the last time. and so maybe he is creating so much very interesting rich walls.