dana: the new york times story was lazy. greg: yeah, incredibly bland. do the right virtue signals, you can do anything to avoid scrutiny. harvey weinstein is a better exam. all his causes were women, feminists, and hehe is raping people. dana: said he would give a million to climate change efforts. jessica: and the no scrutiny part, i get it about that story. i think there s been such a failure of reporting class, even the technology world and in currency to understand actually what s going on with crypto and how it works. this only came to the f fore because of a bitcoin serum that was completely made up. his company was going to be bought by a canadian