we are going to and in the process of defining this. but we ll raise the bar for generally speaking aviation security much higher than it is now. so there are new technologies not too far down the road that we ll rely on. but it s a real sophisticated threat. and i will reserve that decision until we see where it s going. chris: the tsa is testing tighter screening of carry-ons, and the idea people who bring their carry-ons will have to unpack them and put food in one bin and electronics and paper in another bin. will you spread that nationwide and what will that do to screening lines? secretary kelly: t.s.a. works for me. the reason we have done that is because of people trying to
we are going to and in the process of defining this. but we ll raise the bar for generally speaking aviation security much higher than it is now. so there are new technologies not too far down the road that we ll rely on. but it s a real sophisticated threat. and i will reserve that decision until we see where it s going. chris: the tsa is testing tighter screening of carry-ons, and the idea people who bring their carry-ons will have topace bin and electronics and paper in another bin. will you spread that nationwide and what will that do to screening lines? secretary kelly: t.s.a. works for me. the reason we have done that is because of people trying to
we are going to and in the process of defining this. but we ll raise the bar for generally speaking aviation security much higher than it is now. so there are new technologies not too far down the road that we ll rely on. but it s a real sophisticated threat. and i will reserve that decision until we see where it s going. chris: the tsa is testing tighter screening of carry-ons, and the idea people who bring their carry-ons will have to unpack them and put food in one bin and electronics and paper in another bin. will you spread that nationwide and what will that do to screening lines? secretary kelly: t.s.a. works for me. the reason we have done that is because of people trying to
of people are looking, listening, hearing this entire field. and i think that s why you re seeing some flux in those poll numbers, because they realize mr. trump has a lot of sound that he generates. but in terms of the substance, there may be some things that are lacking or that they want to hear alternatives about. these debates could be a good place to hear alternatives. nan, thank you so much. michael, appreciate you being with us. we have a lot of other news to get to this morning. a midair explosion and the crash of the russian jet airliner. new satellite images raise new questions about the possibility of a bomb on board. plus, we re just getting word of an uncharacteristic sound picked up. also, billions of dollars spent, long screening lines at airports. is it really keeping us safe when we fly? a new report about tsa effectiveness. might not make you happy. wow. sweet new subaru, huh mitch?
republicans have talked about allowing the white house to make the cuts and the white house doesn t want to do that because republicans have said, i think lindsay graham said if the white house makes these cuts and are allowed to stay where the cuts go, they ll attack him for it. so i think there s a lot of politics going on right here and it doesn t look like it s going to go anywhere anytime soon. each side accusing the other of hyping the impact of the sequester. but obviously, as of today, there have been no nightmares, screening lines at airports, stock market isn t tanking. is it kind of a wait and see that nothing is going to get done unless they feel they re forced to by their tonights? this is one of those areas where the longer the cuts stay in place, the longer and more severe we re going to see the cuts here. so i think this is one of those where it s a wait and see. the president is hoping that these cuts will become more evident and folks will start to feel the pain a