he does a lot of this to deflect. in new york it worked. you can have screaming headlines about some crazy thing he s done that might deflect from something that s really going on. in term os of the international media covering the presidency, the problem for president trump is we can cover it all. we can cover the i.c.e. raids. we can cover the census issue. we can cover the acosta story easily for a great time of time until we get the answers. we can cover the rush y probe. what about the children being used atd the border. we have a lot of air time and a lot of great reporters. and we can cover it all. and we will. the more he puts out this, the more we will cover. just weeks after a fight over an emergency border bill broke out within the democratic caucus, nancy pelosi issued morning to
my question is this. if charges had been brought against a president, then the headlines would all be screaming about, you know, victory, right, for the left. indication. this proves that what the law is saying is right. no charges intrn brought but i don t see screaming headlines saying this vindicates the president. the headline of the new york post. with mueller finished, it s time to probe obama an the investiga. will we get a special counsel or something looking into the nonsense that happened at doj and the fbi. one person talking about investigating the investigators, mark levin will be here. mark levin at 8:00, jerome corsi at 8:20. mark levin was on this show two
lawmakers last week about that informant in the trump presidential campaign. typical of today s screaming headlines, abc s website blared gowdy disputes trump spy claim says fbi acted properly. but that ignores a number of key points that oversight chair gowdy made on fox glide last night. the first was that the doj made clear that trump was not and is not a target of the russia investigation despite the democrats constant disinformation on that point. gowdy could not explain why the fbi did not do that defensive briefing of the trump campaign instoed of relying on an informant inside his campaign. on the angle last night, former federal prosecutor andy mccarthy laid out his theory. there is no question that they spied on the campaign. if you were looking at a corporation and they thought the corporation was corrupted by three people, you would go to the ceo and say i think we have
selectively reporting the fbi and doj briefing of key lawmakers last week about that informant in the trump presidential campaign. while typical of today s screaming headlines, abc blared gaudi disputes the trump spy claim and says fbi acted properly. but that ignores a number of key points that oversight chair gaudi made on fox glide last night. the first was that the doj made clear that trump was not and is not a target of the administration. he could not also explain why the fbi could not do that defensive briefing of the trump campaign instead of relying on a form it inside the campaign. former federal prosecutor andy mccarthy laid out his theory. there is no question that they spied on the campaign. if you were looking at a corporation and they thought the corporation was corrupted by
people on this issue, let alone trying to please everybody. it just doesn t work that way. and when it comes to the trump base, anything that can be construed as amnesty, we will be seeing screaming headlines from breitbart.com, going after trump, if they see any sort of daca fix provides amnesty. and when it comes to any sort of negotiating tactics here, what trump has basically done is put this into 2016. the wall street journal has a poll this morning that that looks at how americans views have changed our immigration, immigration is a you know, is a hot potato issue. but ten years ago, 48% of the country said that immigration hurt america. now that 64% say immigration helps america. and the shift there is among democrats. so whether or not schumer and pelosi, their goal is to score