Whether hes factually right or wrong, is there any reaction from the white house about what ana, not yet. Frankly i would be surprised if there was any response other than referring to us to outside counsel which in this case is Rudy Giuliani. Perhaps not the most tactful way to describe his position to draw this image of the president shooting the former fbi director in the oval office, but essentially what hes arguing is what weve heard the president s legal team argue over and over again, that the president cannot be indicted by virtue of his position. Further, giuliani tried to clarify today some of the key points in that letter that we sent by the White House Legal Team to the special counsel in january. That letter, of course, published yesterday in the New York Times, and in that letter the Trump Legal Team tried to argue that the president because hes the top Law Enforcement officer in the country could end any investigation, if he show chooses, thereby making it impossible for
Mind. I have to be honest, were leaning towards not. If they can convince us, that it will be brief and to the point, there were five or six points they have to clarify, and with that we can get this long nightmare for the American Public over. Leaning towards not. Ellison barber has the latest on this from the white house. Thats right, rick. Giuliani is not totally ruling out a potential sitdown between President Trump and special counsel mueller but he says he is at this point in time leaning towards no. He also said when it comes to that legal memo that was sent back in january, the legal arguments inside it he says that they are strong ones. The 20 page letter was leaked to the New York Times and fox news. We received a copy of the letter yesterday. In it the president s attorneys argue that an in person interview between mueller and President Trump is not necessary because the special counsel has all of the information they need to answer the questions they say they want to ask th
Dated january 29th, 2018. The president has added a new member to his legal team who giuliani did not write this letter, but the legal argument in it are strong. Giuliana also says that it comes to a sitdown between the president of special Counsel Robert Mueller he hasnt ruled it out, but its not particularly keen on it. Theres gotbe a high bar they have to reach in convincing that we look at two things we need. If they can convince us to be brief, to the point in five or six points they have to clarify and without the 10 at this nightmare the American Public over. The mac they argue that an inperson interview between mueller and President Trump is not necessary because the special counsel has all the answers in the form of document in interviews to any questions they plan on asking President Trump. They argue the president s actions could not be obstruction because he has a constitutional and Legal Authority to and the russia probe. Giuliani says constitutionally the president could
The Scottsdale City Council approved an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) at its Sept. 5 meeting that could have water deliveries going to Rio Verde Foothills residents within weeks. The council …
The Scottsdale City Council approved an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) at its Sept. 5 meeting that could have water deliveries going to Rio Verde Foothills residents within weeks. The council unanimously