Warfare as a part of its decades long quest for global dominance, leveraging a multifaceted to supplant the current world order . Im cliff may. Im flds founder and president and were pleased to have you here some in person, some tuning in live for this conversation. In the economic realm, the Chinese Communist party bullies, companies and governments to follow beijings which benefit to the detriment of all others. To discuss how the west can resist chinas illiberal influence and safeguard u. S. National security, we are proud to be joined by bethany allenebrahimian axios china. Reporter, author of the recently published book beijing rules how china weaponized economy to confront the world. Also joining us are liza tobin senior director economy at the special competitive studies project, scc and former china director on the National Security council and scott keefe the Fred Stevenson Research Professor at the Gw Law School and founder of Keefe Strategies during the Obama Administration
Warfare as a part of its decades long quest for global dominance, leveraging a multifaceted to supplant the current world order . Im cliff may. Im flds founder and president and were pleased to have you here some in person, some tuning in live for this conversation. In the economic realm, the Chinese Communist party bullies, companies and governments to follow beijings which benefit to the detriment of all others. To discuss how the west can resist chinas illiberal influence and safeguard u. S. National security, we are proud to be joined by bethany allenebrahimian axios china. Reporter, author of the recently published book beijing rules how china weaponized economy to confront the world. Also joining us are liza tobin senior director economy at the special competitive studies project, scc and former china director on the National Security council and scott keefe the Fred Stevenson Research Professor at the Gw Law School and founder of Keefe Strategies during the Obama Administration
Warfare as a part of its decades long quest for global dominance, leveraging a multifaceted to supplant the current world order . Im cliff may. Im flds founder and president and were pleased to have you here some in person, some tuning in live for this conversation. In the economic realm, the Chinese Communist party bullies, companies and governments to follow beijings which benefit to the detriment of all others. To discuss how the west can resist chinas illiberal influence and safeguard u. S. National security, we are proud to be joined by bethany allenebrahimian axios china. Reporter, author of the recently published book beijing rules how china weaponized economy to confront the world. Also joining us are liza tobin senior director economy at the special competitive studies project, scc and former china director on the National Security council and scott keefe the Fred Stevenson Research Professor at the Gw Law School and founder of Keefe Strategies during the Obama Administration
federal regulation. i speak specifically of recent controversies that relate to european demands that the u.s. adopt a data privacy regime similar to what ak seps from europe. what is the magnitude, and how can we expand the regulatory regime? i got a couple of thoughts about that one. i think when you talk about harmonization, what we actually see is not so much harmonization, but ratcheting up and it s a one-way ratchet again and again and again and especially in the copyright sphere, when you see the move from the united states and the copyright policy that existed for the last couple of years and you move from the convention of trips and what we see again and again on the international level are the minimum standards of protection, so every country has to provide at least this much, but is free to regulate more and more and more. so the imbalance that occurs there is that you protect more and more, but what you leave out are the safety valves that are designed to make s
c il in dra failure and says a pros thing and all of the these process violations and kickbacks and the obama defense said it was a process that was followed to allocate the money and the substantive question is does the science actually work? it seems like nobody has any confidence to actually evaluate whether that works and that s not a question that s sort of a question that s beneath or above or both people s dignity to think about. so as a libertarian i have no problem with lawyers being in government, but if you are a liberal person who believes that government should be driving science, then you should have some powerful affirmative action quota for it being a government heavily dominated by scientists and technoaccurates. i will go back and forth. people up top, too. i am president of the santa clara university chapter. i am curious about seeing so many silicon valley firms supporting net neutrality because it strikes me as the camel s nose under the tent and i