Several Ohio Supreme Court justices on Tuesday appeared concerned by a proposal that could lead to plaintiffs’ verdicts in medical malpractice cases, even when most of a jury doesn’t find in their favor.
A 37-year-old man died after an emergency surgery in 2017, and his estate sued the medical providers. The medical negligence case required jurors to decide specific issues, including whether the anesthesiologist was negligent in the care of the patient and whether those actions directly caused the harm to the patient. At the trial, the estate and the medical providers disagreed on the correct way for jurors in Ohio to review those issues during deliberations.
administration do to stop it? last time i checked, they were approving sales of almost 20% of our uranium supply. you start talking about the ways we helped russia. we helped russia a lot during the obama administration. that s true. it s more of a political and historical point. the indictment says in started in 2014, well before trump announced. but, listen, there s no question. what scott says is right. it s a piece of the puzzle. but what the congressman said is correct, too. it is a good day for president trump. it is significant that the investigation has gone on this long and you don t have the collusion case. and keep in mind, as andrew mccarthy has pointed out, if you look at the flynn plea papers, it looks like there is going to be no collusion case, certainly
couldn t that then i haven t been a lawyer for a while. saul and scott can contradict me. but doesn t that leave the door open for naming of future individuals. on virtually all indictments have that language. but rod rosenstein did not say that there was no collusion with the trump campaign. he said this indictment doesn t allege that there was collusion. and this indictment doesn t allege that the election was affected. so you can t say anything broader than that. yeah, i certainly have to agree with my colleague. i don t really know what the republicans are celebrating. this is one bucket. this is one indictment of cyberspace. there s still this investigation continues. every chance you get, you want to say that there s no collusion and it vindicates the president. it certainly doesn t. it s one part of a puzzle. i agree.
council regulation allows you to do it. you can do a lot. it doesn t mean you should. ron, your take and then scott and then we ve got to go. rod rosenstein in the appointing order did not identify the crime to be investigated. he said, investigate comey s counterintelligence investigation. the regulations only allow for a special council for a criminal investigation. he did not do that, and that s why a lot of us have been concerned this investigation didn t have any real limits. that s not accurate. okay. scott. investigating russian meddling in the election. yeah, that happened before trump ever announced he was going to run for president. all right, guys. thank you so much. have a great weekend. by the way, russian is planning another brazen campaign. what can the united states do to stop it? answers right after this. your insurance company won t