Are provided they are investing. We would apply the same principle to somebody who was running an airbnb or renting a house as far as the additional employment provisions. If theyve given it to a property manager to run the airbnb and they have no daytoday activities involved in it, the property manager is meeting the tenants coming into the house, providing access, providing cleaning services, if the owner of the business is not conducting the work involved in it, it would not fall under this this is something we have worked extensively with the City Attorneys Office on in terms of getting an interpretation when the supplies and when it doesnt apply. This is how we got to where we were at with the gig economy. Lyft and uber are actively conducting work. It is a little grayer there is a black situation with Something Like airbnb. If you are actively participating in the business, and conducting the business then you would be required to complete this process. Thank you. I just wanted t
Clear that the division has the power to exercise its discretion to do that. There are a number of other issues that we would consider procedural in nature that would be part of the scope of this review process, including whether the division should use warning letters, more frequently than it currently does brady will remember jesse minardi, submitted Public Comment requesting that the division do explicitly that. At the bottom of page four we have set out the policy, or rather the process that we intend to pursue here. Staff have already begun to evaluate what other jurisdictions are doing in terms of a streamlined process. We are also initiating internal conversations, consulting with members of a compliance staff who have ideas about how their own programs are, or are not functioning well and which of the provisions of the programs that they oversee might be suitable for streamline resolutions. Weve envisioned that we would have a first round of interested persons meetings, which i