comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Schuster co - Page 3 : comparemela.com

MN trucking company that used strength tests settles sex discrimination lawsuit

Schuster Company Agrees to Stop Using Strength Test to Settle EEOC Sex Discrimination Lawsuit | U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

Schuster Company Agrees to Stop Using Strength Test to Settle EEOC Sex Discrimination Lawsuit | U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Double Denial In Disparate Impact Litigation: Court Rejects Both EEOC And Employer s Statistical Arguments In Summary Judgment Motions - Employment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis: In EEOC v. Schuster Co., No. 13-CV-4063, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79815 (N.D. Iowa Apr. 13, 2021), the EEOC alleged that Defendant s use of a strength test had disparate impact on female job applicants for driving positions. After both parties moved for summary judgment, the Court denied both motions, holding that the 4/5 Rule relied upon by Defendant served as a general benchmark as opposed to a dispositive measuring stick, and material issues of fact remained as to the business necessity of the test. This ruling is instructive for employers facing EEOC-initiated litigation involving disparate impact allegations, and demonstrates how both Courts and the Commission may interpret statistical

Double Denial In Disparate Impact Litigation: Court Rejects Both EEOC and Employer s Statistical Arguments In Summary Judgment Motions | Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Seyfarth Synopsis:  In EEOC v. Schuster Co., No. 13-CV-4063, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79815 (N.D. Iowa Apr. 13, 2021), the EEOC alleged that Defendant’s use of a strength test had disparate impact on female job applicants for driving positions.  After both parties moved for summary judgment, the Court denied both motions, holding that the “4/5 Rule” relied upon by Defendant served as a general benchmark as opposed to a dispositive measuring stick, and material issues of fact remained as to the business necessity of the test. This ruling is instructive for employers facing EEOC-initiated litigation involving disparate impact allegations, and demonstrates how both Courts and the Commission may interpret statistical defenses stemming from expert reports and testimony.

Trucking Co Can t Put Brakes On EEOC Hiring Bias Suit

ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Trucking Co. Can t Put Brakes On EEOC Hiring Bias Suit Law360 (April 14, 2021, 3:43 PM EDT) An Iowa-based trucking company can t escape a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission suit alleging a strength test used in the company s hiring process boxes out female driver applicants, finding the EEOC s case was strong enough to head to trial. In an order filed Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Linda R. Reade refused to award summary judgment to Schuster Co. on the federal workplace bias watchdog s claims that the test had an unlawful disproportionate impact on women. Judge Reade denied a partial summary judgment bid by the EEOC to wrap up the proposed class action in its favor, finding that there were still.

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.