In light of her loss and donald trump winning, i think theres a lot of people kind of like brexit, could have, would have, should have, if i could have thought about any vote i might have voted for hillary. Reporter clintons largest applaud came after this remark. There was a recent study showing that none of my plans were publicized or talked about. That gives me something for speeches for at least a decade. Reporter and that really was the moment that got everyone talking. Many people were chatting about that as they exited her speech today. Now clinton said that discrimination against women has improved since her days as a young attorney but its still something that all women, especially minority women need to be on the lookout for. In San Francisco, im peggy bunker, nbc bay area news. If you want to see more, you can watch it on ourstory box on page. Fire crews in the east bay are trying to pig out what sparked this fire yesterday. It broke out at an oakland apartment building. Tod
Agreement to partner in a pipeline for the administrator leadership to cover the 20152016 20162017 fiscal years fund by eye a grant from the United States department of justice by a district contribution of 5725,000 paid to t n t over 3 years thats it authorizing me to enter or enter into the negotiation if the counteracting explicit moot with the expectations of the district or u a partners that will not come forward only authorizing me to secure a contract. Enter into an agreement not just negotiate so would you object to those principles saying tilt mr. Davis this is our grant so according to this what we see are only reference is involved in the goal setting progress in no one object well put something to say well design the program and in the consultant about their responsibilities to say what were asking to implement the programs weve designed thats all the proposal says otherwise. It was my intent and my last conversation to convey that understanding that this is going to be a c
Destructibility to enter into an agreement to partner in a pipeline for the administrator leadership to cover the 20152016 20162017 fiscal years fund by eye a grant from the United States department of justice by a district contribution of 5725,000 paid to t n t over 3 years thats it authorizing me to enter or enter into the negotiation if the counteracting explicit moot with the expectations of the district or u a partners that will not come forward only authorizing me to secure a contract. Enter into an agreement not just negotiate so would you object to those principles saying tilt mr. Davis this is our grant so according to this what we see are only reference is involved in the goal setting progress in no one object well put something to say well design the program and in the consultant about their responsibilities to say what were asking to implement the programs weve designed thats all the proposal says otherwise. It was my intent and my last conversation to convey that understan
Been the design team and program nothing that says the new teacher project will be implementing a Program Designed by sfusd personnel so ill ask that those concepts be put actually, it is a big problem for the board should be a problem for all members of the board to be asked when nothing in writing it tells you what it actually is so at least thats what were being told dont believe whats in the grant proposal were doing this somaticly it will happen the way we want it to so were going to vote on something clearly not written down im asking for a commitment to include the commitment what were being told is, in fact, what the understanding of what this is i dont think there should be any problem expanding that lion in the districts responsibility beyond the destructibility and whoever else gets to be involved in goal setting and in the part about the new teacher robot to work and implement what is designed by our dental. And our district wants all the members of the board in my opinion
The United States department of justice by a district contribution of 5725,000 paid to t n t over 3 years thats it authorizing me to enter or enter into the negotiation if the counteracting explicit moot with the expectations of the district or u a partners that will not come forward only authorizing me to secure a contract. Enter into an agreement not just negotiate so would you object to those principles saying tilt mr. Davis this is our grant so according to this what we see are only reference is involved in the goal setting progress in no one object well put something to say well design the program and in the consultant about their responsibilities to say what were asking to implement the programs weve designed thats all the proposal says otherwise. It was my intent and my last conversation to convey that understanding that this is going to be a contract that is favorable to the aims the district and the board of education a thats what well do and the joins im getting here he are.