Page 3 - Scholarly News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

do you think she should have stai stayed on? this is a very nuanced issue. the first thing is you have to state and say that she was below par at her testimony. many of those presidents were below par. not sure why they went. they gave a lot of legal answers to moral questions and that was not appropriate. so that s first. the second thing though is these issues of plagiarism, the piling on that we ve seen, the accusations of plagiarism i should say and the piling on, yes, it is rooted in racial animus. should she have resigned? the answer the no. and i m disappointed that she did. you have a lot of individuals coming and questioning here. scholarly credentials who cannot hold a candle to her. they re questioning whether or not she got the job because of the color of her skin. they re calling her an affirmative action hire. this woman deserves more respect than that. she got that respect from her colleagues in academia, but now you just see the piling on and individuals who should no

Piling onAffirmative action hire