visit vwdealer.com today. [ applause ] here are the scholarly, and dignified miss martha ray and mr. james durant. will you do me a favor? certainly. what is it? tell me, what does documentary mean? jimmy, you mean you don t know the meaning of the word documentary? that s one of the few. [ laughter ] is any oscar category reflects changing times, it s documentaries. the academy established the category during world war ii. early oscars went to government sponsored films.
we re not talking about the attorney s fees which i think were estimated from what i read about a million dollars. these are the out-of-pocket expenses used by the defense. this judge as we saw throughout, she s very much scholarly. she s very much a student of the law. she is very strong when it comes to really following the dictate of each particular statute and the statute in this case is very clear. there is no common law which controls a reimbursement. this is all statutory. being statutory, this florida statute, 939.06 i think she ll follow it strictly as the supreme court in 91997 said she must do. if she follows the law the public opinion either side truthfully be dammed and she ll follow the law saying expenses are limited. when would she make that decision, mark? i m sorry? when would she make the
he s very conservativconservati compassionate and scholarly. he would make history if selected to be pope as the first american to lead the catholic church. i m paula newton in montreal quebec, the home providence of canadian contender marc ouellet. that makes him very important to some looking for change and growth in the catholic church, but he is not a reform candidate. he has very conservative views of ordaining women, about abortion, about same-sex marriage and for that reason he may be seen as a steady hand and someone who would be capable of ushering in reform, but mind you, at a very, very slow pace. many here believe that he would be a good candidate. others believe he would be controversial and in what is the most liberal places in north america, this would be a very conservative choice. i m shasta darlington in sao
very fair, very studios, very detailed. and i think one thing that will happen is whatever decision that he ultimately makes, if it comes back to him from the court of appeals, is it will be a scholarly and correct opinion. i understand, but i mean, this is all anyone is talking about, and he is the reason why, you know, this ban isn t in effect as of now. i mean, can you just tell me the gist of his reaction or his message? well, i think i think it s like everything else, like every u.s. district judge, he takes his responsibilities very seriously. he understands how serious this issue is. he understands that he has attracted the attention of the president. he has attracted the attention of the department of justice.