virtue of the way the administration s handled it. i agree with you there. scandalously bad ol politics. you make your point and i got a question for you. i got to address michael s points. he says these rooems of paper don t mention progressive groups often. i went through all documents released by house democrats yesterday. progressives were mentioned on pre single one of them in addition to tea party groups. i don t think that s a valid point. michael mentioned progressive groups haven t been outraged. a group called progress group, a liberal group in texas was outraged and did receive extra scrutiny and complained about it. so i don t agree with his point there. we re more conservatives targeted? were more conservative groups targeted perhaps in this dragnet? yes, but that could be a function of the fact that more consecutive groups were applying for tax exempt statnous 2010 and 2011 in the wake of the citizens united decision. what from our reporting and from documents i ve lo