discussions with the campaign, and payments to the kremlin-backed hackers and so those two pieces of information and the extent to which mr. cohen has verifiable facts or testimony relating to, i think that those two pieces could blow this up for the president. and then the question will become, what happens next? is there going to be accountability through the congress? is there going to be accountability through the justice can department, and now of course we have mr. whitaker in charge which is a huge question mark as to how much he is going to or he can, but would be willing to interfere with this process. kim wehle, big thanks to you and danny cevallos, one of our legal analysts. thank you so much. and again, breaking news here, and we will continue the follow michael cohen, the president s one-time personal attorney and fixer with a surprise appearance this morning in a federal courtroom pleading guilty to a new charge, and it would also appear that he is cooperating
out how and why he allegedly carried out the attacks with his brother later killed in a police shoot-out, the justice can department s role in the investigation has come under intense scrutiny. tsarnaev has stopped giving substantive information to authorities since being read his miranda rights sources have indicated. and in an exclusive interview with brianna keilar at the white house correspondents dinner saturday night, attorney general eric holder defended the decision. can you comment on the decision to mirandize in. that was totally consistent with the laws that we have. we had a two day period that we were able to question him under the public safety exception, so i think everything was done appropriately and we got good leads. reporter: republican congressman peter king strongly disagreed saying more time to interrogate tsarnaev could have brought fort new critical information to keep america
scandal. i like the idea of how do you deal with problem relatives. i never said you said it was a scan department of i don t know why you are i don t know why you are being defensive. i am not being defensive. i tell you one thing, dreams of my father s brother would have been way better. dreams of my father s half brother. a little more specific book. one in four want obama to run. when asked, generally making the candidate look weak which makes the party look weak, and therefore it is sfrowned upon by the party because as we all know the party is more pornts than anything else including the country. right. i guess so. but we do it all the time. republicans are running against each other. people love attacking each other in politics. why not go for the big guy? i think that would be great. dana any thoughts on that? no.
deal with problem relatives. i never said you said it was a scan department of i don t know why you are i don t know why you are being defensive. i am not being defensive. i tell you one thing, dreams of my father s brother would have been way better. dreams of my father s half brother. a little more specific book. one in four want obama to run. when asked, generally making the candidate look weak which makes the party look weak, and therefore it is sfrowned upon by the party because as we all know the party is more pornts than anything else including the country. right. i guess so. but we do it all the time. republicans are running against each other. people love attacking each other in politics. why not go for the big guy? i think that would be great. dana any thoughts on that? no. when you say big guy, are you talking obama or fifth