nn pundits that want to keep their jobs pretending america s freedom of the press is in danger. this naturally includes their chief white house correspondent, almost as unhinged as liberal joe, jim acosta. what we re witnessing right now is just this erosion of freedoms in terms of covering the president of the united states. i could hold up my phone tomorrow, and live stream, uh, that press briefing with sean spicer or sanders, whoever comes in there. that is just where technology is right now. to think that we re going backwards and not having things on camera is just - - . h i m so sorry, uh, jim you re still whiningt about the camers in the press briefing room? well, maybe it s - - maybe you just need a hug. go see joe and mika. sadly acosta s constant whining and complaining and crying pales in comparison to one cnn morning host who actually believes the
report the program, period. they said they weren t lookingg at american data or any phoney calls. it turns out they are looking at billions of phone calls every day. so i think the whole programpr needs to be reviewed, but it can t be an internal audit. there is a similarity between this scandal and all of the other scandals. they will do an internalin audit. he thought the state department could do an internal audit also. the thing is nobody was everrom fired in the state departmentno and no one has been fired in the irs. the director of national intelligence lied to the senate and greatly damaged the credibility of our intelligence community and nothing has happened. there areha no reprecussion cautions repercussions saying we had lawyers who camers together and said we work for the nsa.e on the only way to find justice is to hear both sides. to there really needs to be arom discussion from people who are a littlele more skeptical of the nsa in an open court i thinki th
amendment. i don t know why the court couldn t say that and not the crap i just read. it is not the fact that the speech is outrageous. it is where the speech is. it is the right of privacy. i believe the funeral in question was in public cemeteries where the phelps was on public land. yes, that s correct. so you can t restrict them on public land, i don t think. you can get your mofia relatives after them. again, not a bad idea. mike, you asked why there hasn t been a counter effort aimed at the church. i think it is because nobody wants to give them the publicity except us. they are not going to go away. it is like fraud sisters and scamers. they are not going away. they keep doing what they do. they won t go away until somebody makes their life as miserable as they make other. i can t imagine they make anybody s lives more miz believe rai. these are literally the most
i have been following them. by the way, that s what your question to diane was. what would you do? and it should be handled privately. they are not a dime a dozen. they are flakes and they can handled. one of the thing the judges said is they have a right for an injunction against people. i wonder how legal that is. i don t think it is as easy as the judges made it sound. cane tell you something weird. i like ponies. no, i got a letter a year ago. it was a press letter that was well written telling me they had tapes available to show them. they were like almost as though they were selling a new book or any kind of product. they were completely blind as to what they were doing except they wanted press. i really do believe there is a performance art aspect. these people are scamers. they are into it for the you are giving them the exact press they need.