doing. it s not legitimate before the groups are even formed to say give me your donor list. that looks like it s cutting an organization down. irs should not be about shutting organizations down or outing people because of their political beliefs. that is not the essence of who we are and what we believe in this country, and the law should be applied equally and fairly to all organizations. some organizations shouldn t get a pass, because they happen to believe and articulate what this administration is articulating, that is not our standard in this country. shannon: we ll keep an eye on it. we know you will as well. i absolutely well. shannon: it was a flight that one passenger described as a quote, vomitorium. losing their lunch on a flight that lasted five hours and brought them back to the city where they started. a decision in the case of a texas father who saw his young daughter be attacked and killed the man he says was attacking
announced. this case is expected to go to the jury as soon as tomorrow following the c csing arguments. the jury, the judge said is going to be sequestered so that they are not going to be exposed to outside influences. shannon. shannon: david lee miller live at the trial in pennsylvania, thank you. a third round of nuclear talks with iran ending with an agreement to meet yet again. critics saying those talks were a major failure no matter how you try to spin it. so what happens now? plus arizona governor jan brewer waiting for a supreme court ruling on her state s immigration law that could come as soon as tomorrow morning. we ll ask her what the state has planned, if it stands or if that law is knocked down. and a congressional oversight committee returns to this room any time, they may hold that vote to hold the attorney general in contempt. just ahead we ll talk with a key committee member about where this showdown goes next. you know, that s who i really feel for. their son is d
going forward. of course, we have some issues still dealing in the federal court. here in the federal district. we are a long ways from the solution unless they would just absolutely support and make their opinion positive for the whole senate bill 1070. but the bottom line is, senate bill 1070 ought to be upheld. their opinion ought to come out and be positive. it does nothing more than mirror a federal law. so we are a country of laws. we believe in the rule of law. it goes back shab there are four different provisions. you may win on some and lose on others. if portions of the law, the heart of the bill are upheld, there are numerous groups planning to take it back to court. do you feel the law will be tied
gander. is this selective attacks on tea party groups because of what they believe, and because they believe differently than the obama administration? this shouldn t be done to any group because of the beliefs that they hold as a sews welfare organization, or if they engage in political activity, which is protected under the irs law, if that s all they are doing then they are wrong and it should be taken away. but if that is only a part of what they are doing, then donors names should not be brought forth, because it chills the purpose of a social welfare organization. people either want to do it anonymously, they don t want credit for it or they don t want other people to know what their beliefs are. shannon: do you think democrats have a point? take a look at these groups, see if they are engagin engaging primarily in politics or social welfare. is that legitimate. it s a legitimate inquiry to see what the organization is
it sounds like they have. it seems like i m back in the nixon time with the invocation of executive privilege and the allegations of abuse of the irs by political opponents. they are asking the irs what are you doing to 501c4 organizations which are charitable organizations, usually social welfare organizations, or civic leagues who have the ability to engage in political activity? it shouldn t be their primary activity but they have the right under the law. they also have the right, the donors to those organizations to be anonymous, and not to be available in washington d.c. for enemies of their viewpoint to go in and take their names down.