the two charges, two misdemeanors out of the equation, the fact that he was 17 years old, breaking curfew, the fact that he was underage and had a rifle, the judge used some obscure drafting error in the law to justify not putting that in front of the jury, suddenly kyle rittenhouse s declaration that he did nothing wrong gave that some wings. you see all the second amendment right advocates essentially asserting he had a right to be there. so we have this really weird outcome where someone we all say shouldn t have been there is somehow sort of boot strapped into being legitimately on the scene, and of course, able to
nuclear weapon far into the future. and you have to compare it to the alternative. some people say to keep squeezing them but we tried that for more than a decade. and what happened? they went from having 150 centrifuges to having 19,000 before we stopped them. and they built up a stockpile of enriched uranium to make 10 to 12 bombs until we stopped them. and the partners we need around the world for sanctions, there s no consensus say shouldn t have a peaceful military program. the other action is military action. we know we can set back their program by nuclear action. this deal sets it back far longer. if you take the military action the net reaction is you can t bomb away knowledge. iran would eventually brace a bomb. this is the best way to prevent them from getting a weapon far, far into the future. the push-back is yes, you could have squeezed the
medical use. 6% medical use only and 3% say shouldn t be legal at all. as far as breakdown in political party, take a look as far as those that responded. those in democratic party 92% said yes recreational medical. 85% of ind innocentependents and 100% of republicans. no legalization at all, 1% of democratic viewers, 7% independents. really interesting here. we re going to have a break down as far as where pot stands in the united states as far as legalization as well and where democrat skpik republican contenders stands on who has inhaled or not. i don t think 4/20 shows up on anybody s calendar chart as a regular day off. i don t think so. coming up we head to new
we will see. look at the bigger picture here. angela, we mentioned 20 years since president clinton became president the number of women in cabinet has not changed and went down to 8 during the bush years. once the ceiling was broken during the clinton years somebody say shouldn t be expect more improvements that it might be easier now to increase those numbers? absolutely, richard. i think we also need to look, again, at the totality of the circumstances. where are the number of women on corporate boards throughout america s fortune 500 companies? where are our ceos and the women running washington s trade association? this is an overall problem that is is not just for the president to address. has he dressed it? certainly. we talked about the judicial nominations. we talked about other ways in which he has made sure they are represented, for example, in the white house. so on the staff. so you can t just look at this one isolated place. you have to look at the
beach. there we go. there we go. david, thank you for being with us. david, i m surprised, it seems to me that the second and third debates haven t had the impact that s what i was going to ask chuck why. that the first debate had. i ll tell you. mitt romney was just reading scripts in his head the other night. needless to say an important nugget, david, an important nugget, you were asking, do you know, it was the longest period between first and second debates since 1988. that is why that first debate had correct. all right, chuck todd, thank you. we ll see you at 9:00 on the daily rundown. david remnick, thank you as well. what a day. the new issue of the new yorker is out right now. reverend al, stay with us. i love it, actually. i love it. we ll take a closer look at who has the momentum in the decisive battleground states with the editor and co-founder