Understand the implications, so much so that the inquiry was exasperated by the end of it. Also the issue of Remote Access and we are likely to have questioning about what she knew and when she knew it. Yesterday she said she missed a key e mail about this in 2010 and all of this started with an apology that many of the victims i spoke to were not particularly satisfied with. I spoke to one victim who was a Sub Postmistress and was accused of stealing but was eventually wrongly convicted of False Accounting and a listen. Studio i think we will listen to that now. ,. , studio i think we will listen to thatnow. ,. ,. , that now. Because she was already contradicting that now. Because she was already contradicting herself, that now. Because she was already contradicting herself, she that now. Because she was already contradicting herself, she said that now. Because she was already contradicting herself, she said one| contradicting herself, she said one thing contradicting herself, she s
having heard that, eugene, what do you think? i mean, it s very clear that the house is starting to flex its muscle a little bit. right. usually we think about the senate as the end all be all when it comes to bills. progressives in the house have been telling joe manchin, kyrsten sinema, all the moderates in the senate that we want this reconciliation bill. we re not signing on to anything. as the process has moved forward and you saw kyrsten sinema say she didn t like $3.5 trillion it was too much, you hear more from the progressives, people like aoc and others saying we re not going vote for the bill unless it goes through with the reconciliation bill. the question is timing. how long is too long to hold the bipartisan bill before the reconciliation bill starts to move through the process and that answer we don t have. we know is that there s a slim
occurred we would have heard about it and the behavior is completely out of character for bret. in fairness, who knows what type of information we will see in coming days because, you know, this is all new information. that s right, you will see that there s more discussion of this but i think it s important to know that in the context of dr. ford s allegations the woman that she said was at the party that the dr. ford s allegations stem from say she didn t know judge kavanaugh and we are talking about these statements by classmates of judge kavanaugh, that seems to be the same situation in this case, so we are seeing many similarities, anybody can make the claim and outrageous claim about someone but what matters are facts and evidence and the facts in this case are going to show that judge kavanaugh is going to be able to withstand the smear attempt because of sterling character and sterling reputation.