that was landing in detroit in 2009. does that make him legally justifiable to kill him in yemen? that s difficult to say. so i think this did save lives in the end. and that s the tough thing here is no easy answer. but the polling, i wanted to ask each of you this before we go. approving of drone strikes. 41% say go ahead. see, what i don t understand is that 41 and 13 those numbers should be the same. all the difference is is geography. well, the citizenship, too. i think what people are
it was directly involved in a plot to take down an airliner that was landing in detroit in 2009. does that make him legally justifiable to kill him in yemen? that s difficult to say. so i think this did save lives in the end. and that s the tough thing here tlchlt is no easy answer. but the polling, i wanted to ask each of you this before we go. approving of drone strikes. 41% say go ahead. see, what i don t understand is that 41 and 13 those numbers should be the same. all the difference is is geography.
so i mean this in this case there was somebody involved in plotting tt was directly involved in the plot to take down an airliner that is landing in detroit in 2009. now, does that make him legally justifiable to kill him in yemen? that s a very, very difficult question. but i will say this. he was definitely involved in targeting and involved in terrorist attacks in the u.s. so i think this did save lives in the end. right. that, of course, is that s the tough thing here. there is no easy answer. we know what the president knows. the polling, i want to ask each of you this before we go. approving of drone strikes, 65% of americans say, yes, go ahead and drone them overseas. suspected people by the way. in other words, no due process. 41% say go ahead and drone an american citizen abroad who is suspected of terrorism. only 13% say drone a suspect on u.s. soil. the numbers should be the same. the difference is geography.
increase has support of 37%. 60% say go ahead and pull them up on the income earnings at the top. if this election was about anything. there was one thing that was clear that was at stake in this election it was the top rates for individuals. even if you just watch a little of the debate. there is no question that was probably the central policy issue that was debaited and one side one and one side lost. no one can pretend there is a clear democratic judgement on that policy. the thing about single voters, reproductive vite rights is yo single issue and you are a republican woman in new jersey and you are going to vote for the president on this.
they overspend but one of the areas i understand is on their car. is that right? it happens all the time. in the market for a new car, the folks at kipplinger s say go used. the moment any car is driven off the lot it loses about 20% of the value and then 65% in just the first five years alone and they say buying useded can save on insurance and taxes, as well. around with gas $4 a gallon, filling up with regular unless the manufacturer says premium is definitely the way to go and with the 3,000-mile check-up, skip it. many can go 5,000 to 7,000 between tune-ups and many have sensors to tell you when to change your oil. check with the owner s manual. i m a sucker for the car.