it s the advice of counsel. where are the lines? because this is what the case will ultimately come down to, the advice that people likejohn eastman and some of the others were giving him, regarding the election. if they were giving him knowingly false advice, was that covered by the first amendment? so false advice, was that covered by the first amendment? the first amendment? so the strongest the first amendment? so the strongest case the first amendment? so the strongest case here - the first amendment? so the strongest case here would i the first amendment? so the i strongest case here would have the first amendment? so the - strongest case here would have been if prosecutors could have brought the argument that donald trump willfully the argument that donald trump willfully incited violence on january willfully incited violence on january six, because there was no first oer january six, because there was no first peramendment january six, because there was no first per ame
of its community for many years. so there s that element that we took l into consideration by trying to stepl in and offer that service - to to to the people that we serve in and offer that service - to the people that we serve through the hotel and the restaurant and things like that. it s regularly talked about the world is becoming digital and we should get more stuff done online, but it s not always possible for everyone. one of your finest, first class. beth parsons, bbc north. you are alive with bbc news. we ve got chris bruce and jay moreno on with us today, these are life pictures of newjersey where donald trump is expected to take out for georgia and arrive at the fulton county courthouse at 7:30pm tonight.
setting out a timeline of what went on in georgia? on in georgia? i think it s very important. on in georgia? i think it s very important, christian, - on in georgia? i think it s very important, christian, for- on in georgia? i think it s very important, christian, for the l important, christian, for the prosecution because he is the president s chief of staff, former president s chief of staff, former president s chief of staff. every piece president s chief of staff. every piece of president s chief of staff. every piece of paper, every scheduling request, piece of paper, every scheduling request, everything that gets to the president s desk, the white house chief of president s desk, the white house chief of staff has two lay eyes on it and chief of staff has two lay eyes on it and ultimately approve it. so the prosecution is going to want to use mark prosecution is going to want to use mark meadows to set some sort of timeline mark meadows to set some sort of timelin
campaign, isn t it? it for the other eight to run a campaign, isn t it?- for the other eight to run a campaign, isn t it? it is a very stranue campaign, isn t it? it is a very strange campaign, campaign, isn t it? it is a very strange campaign, if - campaign, isn t it? it is a very strange campaign, if you - campaign, isn t it? it is a very strange campaign, if you look| campaign, isn t it? it is a very i strange campaign, if you look at campaign, isn t it? it is a very - strange campaign, if you look at the polling strange campaign, if you look at the polling numbers. strange campaign, if you look at the polling numbers, either strange campaign, if you look at the polling numbers, eithertrump- strange campaign, if you look at thel polling numbers, either trump blows up polling numbers, either trump blows up or polling numbers, either trump blows up or he polling numbers, either trump blows up or he wins polling numbers, either trump blows up or he wins the polling numbers,