is this something he made up, or did someone tell him this was the case? so it would require some interviews to get to that point. so i think mark meadows for so many reasons could be a very valuable witness in both the mar-a-lago case and the january 6th case. katie, it s friday, been a remarkable week of sort of incremental reveals. but as barbs talking you realize that what s become clear is that this is very active on both sides. sort of going back and forth now with donald trump s legal team in a way that maybe at the beginning they didn t think they d have to before there was a judge aileen cannon who saw privileges trump didn t assert and who saw classification that s not classification, and who saw the federal government as not owning classified documents. but it does seem like some of this has been gamed out before it became public facing at all. and one of that is the what seems to be the mountain of evidence around the obstruction question i just asked about.
records, theies espionage account and obstruction of justice do not require proof that documents were classified. i think it s a good talking point that maybe works well with the base. at the end of the day, it s not going to matter in a criminal case against donald trump. such a good reminder. i mean, everything that the doj has filed is about national defense information. there really it isn t about the classification. but i guess hugh hewitt hasn t read the documents. let me show what hillary clinton had to say about all of this yesterday. i don t care what political party you are, but come on, cut the hypocrisy. this is a threat to our national security. somebody would have in his country club storage room his desk, his bedroom, top-secret information, and you have to ask yourself why? what was he going to do with it? who was he giving it to? what had he already done to it. what he had already done. let the investigation go forward, and let s find the facts. unlike those