if they can satsify rudy, they can satisfy the president. that from a person familiar with the meeting. meanwhile the white house is refusing to cooperate with what it calls an illegitimate effort to overturn the results of the election. referringing to the impeachment inquiry. and one of the main arguments? the president s due process rights have been curtailed without a vote to formalize the impeachment process. now if a vote is held, what could happen? republicans would have the right to argue for more subpoena power. speaker pelosi knows this. she responded this way. the white house should be warned that continued efforts to hide the truth of the powers, the president s abuse of powers from the american people will be regarded as furtherer evidence of obstruction.
these footnotes for the democrats. we re not going to comply. this is a sham. you democrats didn t follow the rules. you re not being fair. so that s why we re not can complying in any way. and right after the letter got sent a report came out that once agon reminded why this is being conducted the way it is. turns out when the energy secretary rick perry, who for some reason wound up being part of the ukrain dynamic and said i think he s the real deal, the president said go to rudy. if you can convince rudy, i m in. really inlet s bring in presidential candidate and senate judiciary member, omy klobuchar. welcome back that show. i was grateful to be on the last segment. seemed like you turn itted into judge yourself.
nox i don t. when we re talking about the impeachment of a president to make sure we have a completely fair process where the president s concerns get waved fairly and the minority i hear you. but as a former intel official you had no comment about the energy secretary being told to go to rudy. you have no comment about this mad scramble that echoes what we saw in the text. not anonymous sources. we saw it in text everybody covering up. i think you re changing the subject from the process. nancy pelosi can t answer. she doesn t have to. she doesn t have to. you re right but she should so the american people should be sure this is a fair process. that the president is not being railroaded and he is. i don t know that will guarantee fairness when it s just going to be competing interests.
so put on your investigator hat for a second. the idea of after the call people scrambling, talking to lawyers about how to clear it up, basically evidencing what we saw from acting ambassador taylor in term s of are we conditioning the aid on this deal with biden? and we know that moves forward to a point where the energy secretary comes back from ukrain and says from the president i think you should work for this guy. and the president says to him go to rudy. convince him you get my okay. i think a lot of this is based on anonymous sources we can t confirm. i see a very bias process not following precedent. i m more concerned that they re trying to impeach a sitting president using a secret witness that the american people will not be allowed to hear from where his voice will be obscured