Possible copyright implications for Software Development ahead of the Supreme Court case google versus oracle. Thats an institute hosted this event looking at the history of copyright protections and the importance of code being protected by copyright laws. Its an hour ten minutes. All right. I believe we will now begin. Thank you all for coming to our event today on google versus oracle case. Officially titled consequences of the case here i actually have my own subtitle, which is copyright in the future of the Software Industry. Very significant case and absolutely delighted to have adam mossoff here to speak to us today about the relevant legal policy in commercial issues that are raised by this case. My name is adam mossoff and i am a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and also now the chair of the newly constituted forum for intellectual property at the Hudson Institute. This is, in fact, our inaugural event and so were delighted to have it on such an important issue and with s
Adam all right. I believe that we will now begin. So thank you all for coming to our event today on the google v. Oracle case. Officially titled consequences of the case. I actually have my own subtitle, which is copyright and the future of the industry. Very it is a very significant case. Absolutely delighted to have the director of patents to speak to us about the legal policy and commercial issues raised by this case. My name is adam mossoff. Im a senior fellow at the hudson institute. And im the chair of the newly constituted forum for intellectual property at the hudson institute. This is our inaugural event and were delighted to have it on such an important issue and such a great speaker. We will be hosting events and promoting datadriven fact base research that explores and investigates the important and key roles that intellectual property plays and not just driving the u. S. Economy for the past 230 years but all innovation economies throughout the world creating the foundatio
Our event today on the google versus oracle case, titled consequences of the case. I actually have my own subtitle which is copyright and the future of the industry, a significant case and i am delighted to have 2 wilson here to speak to us about the relevant legal policy on commercial issues and raised by this case. My name is adam maasoff, the chair of the International Forum for intellectual property at the hudson institute. This is our novel even, delighted to have it on such an important issue with such a great speaker. There will be events, sponsoring and promoting datadriven research that explores and investigates the importance of intellectual property and not just driving the Us Innovation economy for the past 230 years but all innovation economies creating a foundation for Flourishing Society and we hope to play a role that factbased research and datadriven in the hands of our policymakers as they consider the very important issues such as decisions that have to be made in im
Its just gotten under way. The issue of Climate Change has been with us for decades. Esi stated all the way back in 1988 that addressing Climate Change is imperative. And experts have been working on the issue and proposing solutions all the while. Instead of just more frequent storms, i hope what were seeing and feeling is momentum to act on these solutions. I think there is some evidence that this is the case. Last week i testified before the Senate Energy committee and the need to reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions was front and center. That probably would not have been the case a few years ago. Again, not something around a few years ago. At esi, we know and our panelists know that inaction on Climate Change is making the solutions we need to limit Global Warming harder and harder to achieve. We have to act now and we need to contribute to the momentum to act and reinforce it constantly reinforce it and this is where esi comes in, to inform policymakers and share Lessons Learned to he
president biden earlier said that israel was losing international support because of what he called its indiscriminate bombing of gaza. our north america correspondent shingai nyoka explains why the us voted against the resolution. it s no surprise they did that, in fact the text of this particular resolution was similar to the one that was debated on friday, with the security council where the us blocked it, vetoed it, and there really was no expectation that the us was going to vote against it. 153 countries or member states of the un, voted in favour of this immediate call for a cease fire, or call for an immediate cease fire and those countries included india and canada. 23 countries abstained, and i think it s interesting to note that the uk is increasingly abstaining in these votes. the uk un ambassador barbara woodward said the support for israel that the uk supports israel s right to defend itself against hamas but said it must be targeted at, must be targeted to achi