by the original sars virus still have to sell immunity 17 years later, that was the original sars. if we had an independent and honest media this new cleveland study would be leading every nightly newscast but like fauci they have committed to the lie that every american must be vaccinated or be made into a social pariahs. it doesn t mean you get to go on with your pre-pandemic life if you re not willing to carry your burden in society. i don t know why you would not take the vaccine. i don t understand this macho thing about i m not going to get the vaccine. be a patriot, protect other people. i say we need to shun those refused to get vaccinated. speaking of vaccines, fauci is also fighting the science on kids vaccine and covid. we hope that as we approach the end of this calendar year we have enough information to vaccinate children of any age.
administration?- credence of the biden administration? ., ., ., , administration? the dominant theory in scientific surface administration? the dominant theory in scientific surface was administration? the dominant theory in scientific surface was that - administration? the dominant theory in scientific surface was that this - in scientific surface was that this jumped the species gap. you heard about the loans and various other creatures that were brought to wet market system. a lot of people and talking to now, including distinguished virologists, they said it was 18 months of those going to be some solid evidence, will be have seen this by now? this is what happened with sars virus before. in a year, someone was able to find the genetic footprint in an animal or near identical virus that trumped the gap. the fact that people cannot find anything that really matches it is causing suspicion. it was, we know that under the trump administration, a certain amount of investigation was
do you have faith in that study? i always thought the level 4 facility in china, they were studying coronavirus-like bats and how to develop a vaccine. the very thing that covid-19 is. and in 2004 with sars, they accidentally leaked the sars virus at another lab. they have a very poor track record for safety. i think the likely is very probable that this got leaked out of that lab. martha: that s why i asked. after they look at everything that you looked at, will they be more open or potentially leaning towards that theory from the biden administration based on what we learned in the past several weeks. congressman, thank you very much. congressman mccall. good to have you here today. thanks. martha: we ll keep digging on this story. it s important to find
at the very least, there is moral culpability. in the research done by the bat scientist in wuhan, she gives him credit. she lists the exact nih grant with the i.d. number listing the money and thanking the nih for the money. it s clearly gain of function. there are several scientists who were in this field, cellular biologists, they all say that taking a sars virus and adding a protein to make it infect human cells that is the very domination of gain of function. it s very dangerous. we shouldn t be doing it here or there, but dr. fauci has denied it to this day. but the private emails show he was acknowledging it was gain of function. the scientific community needs to look at this, because he hides behind this veil of the lab coat that nobody can question him. laura: yeah well i believe that s absolutely gain of function research. and to this day he still saying
with the chinese when he was making excuses for them? at the very least there is culpability. the research done by the bad scientists in wuhan she gives them credit, she lists the exact nih grant with a 10 disclaimer or id number listing the money and thinking the nih for the money. it is clearly gain of function, several scientists are in this field, cellular biologists who all say taking a sars virus and adding an s protein to make infect human cells is the definition of gain of function, very dangerous, shouldn t be doing it here or there but doctor fauci has denied it to this day, the private emails show he is acknowledging it was gain of function, nobody was questioning, the scientific community needs to look at this because he hides behind this they ll of a lab coat that nobody can question him. i believe and by looking at the