do you believe our justice system is a joke? do people say it s a laughingstock? criticism here on both sides, when you have people from the left who talk about how it s pro police and anti-minority, and people on the right say it s a giveaway to terrorists. it is by far the best legal system in the world. i have not practiced law in many years but the adversarial system and the jury system, it s a great check on power. it does protect peoples rights and gets the job done. on terror cases in new york, they have had excellent results. the bomber from last year, that has already gone to trial. if he s wrong on the facts, and he is impugning the integrity of our justice system, shouldn t that be called out by other elected leaders? well, i basically support the president on key issues and on this it s important for me as a
full-bodied. accused of obstructing justice to theat the fbinuclear war, and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who s mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and start doing what s right. our country depends on it.
answers and prevent them from happening again. here there s such a focus, and that has been true on 9/11 on taking extreme action from war to immigration controls to torture to try and crack down on terrorists even though their impact is comparatively smaller outside of 9/11. i think the real focus now for the administration, for congress, is to look at the phenomenon here. somebody who comes here legally and gets radicalized, that s rare because america is a great country, and trying to do a better job monitoring somebody that can be acting alone, motivated not by a state but by an ideology, that s where the focus ought to be. unfortunately the president really thinks out loud, and when
it s not nice, it s not good. the white house insisted, james, time and time again now is not the time to have the situation about gun control, why don t you, the media, respect the victims? isn t finding solutions the ultimate respect for victims? i think for even arden supporters of the president, it s hard not to see the contrast. that vegas shooting on october 1st, and then had the new york attack on october 31st. with that bump fire stock, that shooter out in vegas was able to basically do an equal amount of damage to the most dangerous, the most casualty-causing conflict we fought in iraq, which was the battle of fallujah november to december of 2004.
you are president, you should be much more reasoned. i, for one, as a journalist and a citizen am offended to have to listen to the white house spokes persons come out and be untruthful about what the president just said and waste all of our time, because they are in a tough position where they have to explain the fact that the president said something that was outlandish. let s remind our viewers of the stark difference between the way the president responded to questions about the gun control and what could be done in the wake of the las vegas attack compared to what he said after the new york attack. first las vegas, look at this. we ll be looking into that. i am going to ask congress to immediately initiate work to get rid of this program. diversity lottery, sounds nice,