decide what constitutes reasonable behavior. . the majority is fueling a global internet regulatory pandemic. internet freedom will not be enhanced. it will suffer. my dissent this morning is based on four primary concerns. first, nothing is broken in the internet access market that needs fixing. second, the fcc does not have the legal authority to issue these rules. third, the proposed rules are likely to cause irreparable harm. and fourth, existing law and internet governance structures provide ample consumer protection in the event of a systemic market failure. before i go further, however, i apologize that my statement does not address some important issues raised by the order. but we received the current draft at 11:42 p.m. last night, and my team is still combing through it. first, nothing is broken in the internet access that needs fixing. all levels of internet supply chain are thriving due to row boston competition and low market entry barriers. the nipt has flourish
gay marriage that we did a couple of years ago, bishop eugene robinson, who is a gave bishop, write a five-part series about biblical interpretation of homosexuality, which was really fascinating. and i interviewed him at great length. i did a video interview with anee rice anne rice, who grew up catholic and then became a fee is for 30 years and then went back to the catholic church and then she decided she rejected the catholic church because of their position on homosexuality and a number abortion, a number of things. and just two weeks ago when she was here she went to the national basilica, the shrine, for the first time she sat set foot in a catholic church. she has had this incredible and up and down relationship with the church and with god and her faith. for me, every single person i interviewed, i always ask them about god, what does not mean to them, who is god, and i ask a piece the same question and i never once have the same answer because the legend ult
claimant is. here is tax money being extracted. in general description, it talks about how taxpayer spending will go forward. valley forge makes that clear because the defendant did exactly what you said. look at the economic effect and that alone will be enough. the tax and spending clause does not matter on the bottom line of the treasury. this court said, no, that is not the case. it could not have meant that it is your particular dollar. there is no way to know that is your particular dollar and is tha fiction thing to say. what flax said was that tax payer dollars, not your dollar, but taxpayer dollars are going to this activity in the same way that it is going to the activity here. i disagree. i do not think that is what it is. i think it is that micro fraction of a cent that is being used to fund religion. that is what medicine complained about. it may be very small, that is what madison complain about. flask talked about a nexus. here, as a taxpayer challeng
all right. first, we again with breaking news. this happening out of iran. free at last. iran s press tv reports that american hiker sarah shourd is released after being held for more than a year. reza sayah will join us from pakistan shortly to tell us more about the release and cost $500,000 to get her bail paid. also happening right now, a multi-state manhunt for this doctor, a phoenix area pediatrician suspected of distributing child porn. the fbi says that the dr. luna may have fled from arizona to texas, california illinois or mexico. all places he has called home some point. last week, the doctor under house arrest and required to wear an angle monitoring bracelet but officers say he just cut it off and bolted. keep in mind this is a man whose jobs is to care for our sick, vulnerable kids. and he s charged with five counts of distributing child pornography in interstate commerce. these neighbors, some children were treated at the suspect s office. i don t know why