And now to london for Prime Ministers question time live from the british house of commons. Every wednesday while parliament is in session Prime Minister David Cameron takes questions from members of the house of commons. Prior to question time the house is wrapping up other business. This is live coverage on cspa cspan2. A reminder of the sacrifices that Police Officers make on our behalf every day of every year. Oon a happy note im sure the house will wish to congratulate professor higgs who is sharing this years nobel prize for physics. It is a richly deserved recognition of his research and attribute the uks world leading universities where his research was carried out. Mr. Speaker, this morning i had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, and in addition to my duties in this house, i shall have further such meetings later today. Tom maheras. Can i associate myself and my constituents entirely with attribute the primers has made to the victims of terrorism in nairobi and
Muchneeded reforms for this program that last year supported almost 11 million americans with 137 billion of american taxpayer money. I have closed with one remark. If you work somewhere in the federal government today, i would hope if youre seeing fraud, if youre seeing manipulation, if youre seeing things that are not right, that you will follow the lead of these four courageous women in bringing it to the attention of senator levins subcommittee, permanent subcommittee on investigations or my office. With that, senator carper, i thank you. Thank you so much. Im going to go out of order to ask senator levin who chairs the subcommittee under which this investigation has taken place and ask him just to make a statement. I will make a short statement after that. Then well turn to our witnesses. Senator levin . Thank you very much, senator carper and first let me commend senator coburn for his leadership and his and his staffs hard work in uncovering the abuses that are the subject of to
Host any thoughts . Guest i say this is easily resolved. I think the one thing to be careful of is the difference between sort of partisan decisions and ones that come from different judicial philosophies or ideologies, when you think partisan, you think im going to vote as any republican or democrat would do. I believe that there are a lot of cases at the Supreme Court and we can point to numerous examples that do not follow that traditional breakdown between party lines. And i think a good sample would be coming this term about recess appointments. Here is an issue that will affect whoever the sitting president has come at a sitting president is not currently a democrat. But of course in a future election and maybe the republicans that win an election, therefore the decision that they announce it in the court will be a rule about the perspective power to make these recess appointments regardless of the party of the presidency. What you will see in that decision is the core grappling
With the mother. Getting information from her. All right. You gave a possible diagnosis or a ruleout diagnosis of possible oppositional deficit disorder. Thats a typo. That should say operationally defiant oppositionally defiant. Yeah. Should this child have been tested for this before making this conclusion, or was your assessment that it was probably likely . When a ruleout diagnosis is made, youre not saying the child has this, youre saying theres a likely, or a possibility that the child has it, and, you know, possibly more testing, more formal testing should be done. All right. Would you, please, turn to page 5. And this, which is the beginning of the medical assessment of the bills you do workrelated activities, mental, form provided you by mr. Kahns employees. Yes, sir. This is identical to the form you use for adults. Yes, sir. Do you think this forms appropriate for evaluating children . Well, do i think it now or did i think it then . Answer both. Okay, thank you for letting
Adjust them to the current and future demographic realities of society . People live longer, people need these services longer; what do we do to make this work in a way that these programs can last . These are not programs put in place by this congress. These are not bills incurred by this congress. These are bills, in fact, that this congress and this president can decide, were going to look at these programs and be sure they last and look at these programs and be sure they can be paid for, and thats exactly the kind of discussion we should be having when we ask the American People, through their congress, to extend the line of credit. The idea that we wont negotiate on on the debt ceiling or we wont negotiate on how to spend the money, if we dont negotiate on how to spend the money by bringing the Appropriations Bills to the floor, how are we supposed to negotiate and set priorities and let democracy work . I dont like democracy by cris crisis. And whatever we do in the next few week