You know how cool steve is. He is talking about how cold it is. You are talking warmer though. A freeze warning north and east bay valleys. A freeze warning, Salinas Valley as well. Frost advisory and the lesser of the warnings and watches and temperatures are definitely coming up. The dew points are running a little bit higher and there will not be a quiz. Santa rosa 26 and there is a puff of a breeze, San Francisco, san jose there have been 28 and 29 officially. High pressure again, it will be here for a while, mostly sunny with a few high clouds, and a little bit warmer, temperatures upper 50s for some, but a few lower 60s for capitoa, here is sal. Good morning, we are looking good on this wednesday and traffic continues to look good driving to the bay bridge toll plaza and no major delays if you are driving to San Francisco and beyond that. Also on the commute, it is light and this is where we start seeing traffic early but it is super early to get out there and beat the crowd. Sam
A lot of clouds streaming over us, and a combination of 2 thirds of an inch and we will get a break thursday, friday and saturday and clouds will increase and rain develops and this is looking like a better system. It is a very mild system but look for the breeze to pick up especially the further north you go. Up into mendocino but maybe an evening commute could be a little bit tricky. Overall we are looking for cloudy conditions, over all, mild companies and rain in the north bay and starting to move south later tonight. Starting to move 60s to 70s. And we are okay and we do have those bart problems and we will tell you in just a minute put the best thing is to go to the bay fair more taxty and traffic is still light, the bridge traffic looks good and and so does the san mateo bridge out to the foster city area and 101. 580 westbound looks good from the pass all the way to the valley now there are no trains running and alex is kicking off team coverage. Good morning, alex. Between the
Releasing anyone earlier than when they would be eligible for release. They are only eligible for release when they have done their time so we are letting our Justice System work and we dont believe we should hold anyone beyond that time theyre eligible for release because of a request that came from ice that doesnt have a stamp approval and oversight like it should be and thats where the due process is denialed and when the requests come forward and its approved. Locally we are doing our work. Our department is exemplary in its work up holding the sanctuary city and our whole Justice System is doing its work best it can to make sure that goes forward but its when we have the request from the outside we see the due process denied and we want to create that separation between the local criminal justice enforcement and federal Law Enforcement and thats the basis and why we want this ordinance separate from an amendment with carve outs for people because of offenses. I appreciate that. My
Reoffense and prior conviction there are changes in the rules in the criminal Justice System how you handle those individuals . I would say by and large as spoken by the sheriff that is the case already by policy but i am suggesting there could be an exception to the rule and could be a violent felon or sex offender or weapon possessor and we wouldnt want to keep from being detained. The question is again i agree with that but when we say by law do it through the criminal Justice System instead of injecting immigration and sanctuary. And thats how it is now and if you made the law and those detained wouldnt be detained and could commit a crime in San Francisco. It depends on the specifics and i appreciate the movement by the Sheriffs Office but i dont think we have the right policy. Its actually not the most progressive policy in the country. Santa clara in fact is and santa clara there is santa clara goes beyond what were proposing here, what supervisor avalos is proposing. Santa clar
Criminal Justice System instead of injecting immigration and sanctuary. And thats how it is now and if you made the law and those detained wouldnt be detained and could commit a crime in San Francisco. It depends on the specifics and i appreciate the movement by the Sheriffs Office but i dont think we have the right policy. Its actually not the most progressive policy in the country. Santa clara in fact is and santa clara there is santa clara goes beyond what were proposing here, what supervisor avalos is proposing. Santa clara makes compliance contingent on funding by the federal government which is not really included here. Now to your knowledge even though santa clara has no carve outs, and in fact addresses the issue of Public Safety through the criminal Justice System has there been an increase in criminal activity in santa clara because of that . I mean i want to make sure when we talk about the fear that somehow people are going to flood the geatds of San Francisco if we have th