rulings, i may have disagreed with some of the rulings if i was a lawyer, but overall, i thought that was bizarre. maybe it was the judge. who was exhausted and not thinking. everyone was exhausted at that time. there was a contentious conversation i don t think she liked him at all. and she didn t do that in front of the jury. no, because that has an effect on the client. thank god it didn t happen in front of the jury. and the judge moved the case along very quickly. now, george gets his gun back. any problem with that in your mind? george is an innocent man. the presumption of innocence that he is titled to proceedings and has been exonerated of those
the family attorney, and from the family attorney s perspective, we never endorsed that jury. we respect are you saying it was a bad jury? that is a standing law. was that a bad jury? i do not believe trayvon got equal justice in this instance. specifically how? tell me the evidence that the jury didn t hear. the evidence that the jury didn t hear? i don t think that they properly considered the evidence. if they had listened to the evidence and they had followed the law, then george zimmerman would have been convicted of murder. he got out of the car with a loaded gun. he followed you re a lawyer, right? yes. the whole point of the jury is we assign them the job to weigh the facts, we make them sit there. a lot of times they don t want to be there. we present the evidence and the judge says here s the evidence, here s the law, instructs them on the law. it s your duty, not mine, yours, or anybody els, it s the jury s duty to weigh the evidence.
the prosecution and the defense didn t like each other. i would offer him the opportunity to apologizing to me to say that i showed up with big information. did not mr. zimmerman have the right to have this. this was a trick. doesn t the court realize this was a trick? it s simply unfair for mr. zimmerman not to put on the defense because of the state s tactics? i think it was quite defense i believe. hello. you re the orlando lawyer, sanford lawyer. you know the behind the scenes story. how much do they hate each other? you have to keep in mind, local law enforcement and local prosecutors are like they re relatives we don t get along with, whatever they just local
information to the worries. now at least as i understand it, the reason he said he needed to go somewhere is the state did not turn it over to the defense lawyers. they had an obligation to turn it over. he had concerns whether he would face any legal implications watt not turned over to the defense team. and because he had those concerns, he hired his own attorney to find out what kind of legal exposure he would have in that case. two quick pieces of fact. the lawyer you fired used to be in the state s attorney s office? i don t know. the evidence was turned other to the defense and wanted to introduce at the trial and the judge said that they couldn t authenticate it that trayvon martin had sent, is that correct. the background information was a report, evidence that was
the prosecution and the defense didn t like each other. i would offer him the opportunity to apologizing to me to say that i showed up with big information. did not mr. zimmerman have the right to have this. this was a trick. doesn t the court realize this was a trick? it s simply unfair for mr. zimmerman not to put on the defense because of the state s tactics? i think it was quite defense i believe. hello. you re the orlando lawyer, sanford lawyer. u know the behind the scenes story. how much do they hate each other? you have to keep in mind, local law enforcement and local prosecutors are like they re relatives we don t get along with, whatever they just local