you did? i still do. i think we all did, but there was no evidence. that just drove me nuts. after 11 hours, they reached a decision. guilty of capital murder. guilty of the capital murder. guilty of the capital murder. guilty on all counts for reginald carr. his brother jonathan carr guilty of all but the carjacking of andy schreiber. reginald and jonathan were sitting there expressionless. they didn t show you know, they weren t upset by it. they weren t, you know, happy by it. reginald was sitting there putting chapstick on. that s how much it affected him. for more than six weeks, jurors said they had been hearing and seeing evidence that kept them awake at night. but the toughest task was yet to come, deciding if two men who killed so easily deserved the death penalty. coming up, a new picture of the carr brothers. polite, kind, warm, giving. will the jury spare their lives? when in cold blood continues. we re sitting on a bunch of shale gas.
four friends and the attempted murder of the fifth, but also the kidnapping robbery of schreiber, the killing of h.g. s dog and the shooting of ann walenta. when ann walenta died of her wounds in early january 2001, the brothers were charged with her murder as well. 21 months later, their trial began. this is the case about nine days in december. it s about seven lives. it s about five murders, two survivors and two brothers. reginald carr and jonathan carr. the prosecution intended to prove that the soccer field massacre was only the final flourish in a crime wave. that began with the kidnapping of andy schreiber. the first witness was steve johnson, the man who answered his front door in the pre-dawn hours of december 15, 2000, to discover a naked, bleeding woman standing on his front porch, a woman who said she had just been shot in the head.
to every single crime scene. you couldn t disregard that evidence. we used that during deliberations. when it came down to crucial charges of murder and rape, h.g. s testimony was the turning point. her testimony was a major part of my decision on that. i think all of us cried. you tried to hide the tears? oh, very much so. i think we all did. even so, it was a lot of work, a lot of charges and two defendants. we discussed everything completely before we took any kind of vote. we basically we knew how people were going to vote before we took the vote. oddly, the jurors say the main debate came over one of the lesser charges, whether jonathan carr was the second gunman in the car with andy schreiber, the gunman schreiber never saw. did any of you think jonathan was there? i did.
as the soccer field murders, investigators found connections between jonathan and reginald carr and the two earlier crimes in the same area, the carjacking of andy schreiber and the shooting of ann walenta. remember the watch andy had been wearing on the night he was abducted? it was found in reginald s girlfriend s apartment, and the bullets recovered at all three crime scenes matched. investigators believe both schreiber and walenta were targeted because they drove expensive cars. but the home invasion at the nearby condo didn t make any sense. that is, until a neighbor told police that she d been followed home on the night of the murders by someone who drove away when she stopped at her mailbox. i think they made a mistake, they picked the wrong house. all right i want to know about the search warrant. district attorney nola foulston charged the carrs not only with the murders of the