great enough way as to throw the investigation off or cause them to spend more time or send them in the wrong direction. from the statements that were laid out, the information, it certainly seems that is the case. they were looking at these conversations. he said they didn t happen or certain topics did not come up and later admitted they did. they ve got the admission now that he intentionally, you know, misled the agents about that. the materiality question is one that they probably satisfy the legal standard when they say that. unfortunately, that s the way lawyers talk. dana: [laughs] we are glad you were here to talk with us. bradley, let me read you a quote from andy mccartney. he s at the national review, from a prosecutor. it remains unclear why the obama justice department chose to investigate to be 16. there was nothing wrong with the national security advisor having meetings with foreign counterparts and sanctions in those meetings. plus, the fbi had fis a recordings of