Somebody. By somebody. He was the first da to investigate Jerry Sandusky, could there be a link between that case and his disappearance . Where is this man . Somebody knows something or a lot of somebodys do. Hello and welcome to dateline. Ray gricar was a District Attorney and bellefont, pennsylvania. Not far from Penn State University. He was the first to investigate allegations against Jerry Sandusky who abused the child. That was long before the scandal made headlines. But several years later, ray gricar mysteriously disappeared. The strange turn of events left people asking, was there a connection . Here is lester holt with the case of The Missing Da. The clues are tantalizing, as sporty red car, a speck of cigarette ash. A battered hard drive. It is a mystery, it absolutely is a mystery. But what do these clues say about the sudden disappearance of a District Attorney who left them behind . It is baffling, it is confusing and perplexing it is all of those things. His name is ray
it s true, it s like he vanished into thin air. is very confusing. the a s don t go missing. this one did and hasn t been seen since. was he murdered? was it suicide? did he just walk away? whatever happened here is well planned out. he was the first to investigate coast jerry sandusky. could there be a link between that case and his disappearance? somebody knows something or a lot of somebodies do. somebo hello and welcome to dateline. ray gricar was the first to invest in applications coast jerry sandusky sexually abused the child long before the scandal made headlines. seven years later he mysteriously disappeared. the strange turn of events left people asking was there a connection? here is lester holt with the case of the missing d.a.. the clues are tantalizing. a sporty red car. a speck of cigarette ash. battered hard drive. it absolutely is a mystery. what do those clues say about the sudden disappearance of the district attorney who left them behind?
Great car case but he has followed it for years. after the sandusky story broke. he believes there must have been more. jerry sandusky was continuing to abuse young boys after 1998. and he says that ray gricar must have heard them. i guarantee you, after a district attorney has been in office for some years, there is not any kind of criminal activity that takes place in that county that he is not of where of. he speculates that gricar blamed himself for those alleged abuses, and either walked away or committed suicide. or, he says, maybe gricar knew too much. someone says, mr. gricar we ve kept it quiet all this time. and without you around? we will keep it quiet longer. and that is the end of mr. gricar. but but gricar rule out any connection between the missing da and the sandusky case. i am in no way aware of any reason why there would be a lake. as i said before, we were talking about the person that gricar is. i cannot imagine, based upon the things that i know about
That county that he is not of where of. he speculates that gricar blamed himself for those alleged abuses, and either walked away or committed suicide. or, he says, maybe gricar knew too much. someone says, mr. gricar we ve kept it quiet all this time. and without you around? we will keep it quiet longer. and that is the end of mr. gricar. but but gricar rule out any connection between the missing da and the sandusky case. i am in no way aware of any reason why there would be a lake. as i said before, we were talking about the person that gricar is. i cannot imagine, based upon the things that i know about him, that he would allow something or someone to influence a decision that he thought was the right decision to make. bob agreed. and added this. i see absolutely no
Apply that articulation to this case. is consent of such great significance when everybody agrees she was drugged? that consent s going to be huge in this case, michael and what we do know is that cosby claims that he gave her benadryl. 1 1/2 tablets of benadryl. whereas what the prosecutor is saying is that it s a much more serious drug that left her pretty much in a paralyzed state and incapable of giving consent. so the issue of consent and whether she was able to give consent is huge in this case. i just want to get back to what the other panelist said, about her coming to the house and rejecting him on two prior occasions. let s be clear, no means no. your prior consent doesn t have anything to do with whether you rejected someone one time before, two times before or five times before. if she was incapable often giving consent, this is a sexual assault which he should be