Latest Breaking News On - Sanctions hearing - Page 1 : comparemela.com
Continuation of Sanctions Hearing in the matter of Andrew Kazina
tmcnet.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from tmcnet.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
has what appears to be a live-Tweet transcript of the hearing, as it progressed; I can't be certain that it's accurate, but it seems credible enough to link…
meritless complaints all of which were dismissed that are really designed as a pr strategy to undermine the public s faith in our elections. that is not what the court is for. and there s no rule for lies and misinformation in a court of law. so this sanctions hearing is really what has been established in federal court to protect the sanctity of the courts as a place where justice can be sought and served, not as a place where people can sow seeds of doubt and spread lies about the truth and integrity of our democracy. rudy giuliani is already temporarily disbarred pending full permanent disbarment, which surely is coming in both new york and washington. is that enough to scare off lawyers from doing this in the future? perhaps. but remember there s a lot of things happening here. we re also seeing attorneys benefit financially through fund-raising efforts and others in arizona and michigan by
others who may be trying to explore these shenanigans in future elections, that there is no place for that here in michigan or anywhere else. and that s where this sanctions hearing is primarily designed to do. to hold those who misused their powers of attorneys and hold them accountable. now, the federal court cannot disbar them because they don t actually have jurisdiction over their law licenses but the judge could recommend it to the authorities that control that. one of the defenses that we heard yesterday, which stunned me was that lawyers have a first amendment right to lie in court. they were actually claiming a first amendment right to do this. the judge asked for a single case, could they give her a single case saying that lawyers have a first amendment right to lie in court, and of course they couldn t do that. no. i mean lawyers have a
responsibility to uphold the law, to seek justice on behalf of their clients. not to lie and file frivolous, merit-less complaints, all of which were dismissed. they were designed as a pr strategy to undermine the public s faith in our elections. that is not what the courts are for. there is no room for lies and misinformation in a court of law. frankly, a federal court of law that is designed to uphold the principles of our federal constitution. so the sanctions hearing is really what s been established in federal court to protect the sanctity of the courts as a place where justice can be sought and served, not as a place where people can sow seeds of doubt and spread lies and deceive people about the truth and the integrity of our democracy. rudy giuliani is already temporarily disbarred upending full permanent disbarment which surely is coming in both new york and washington. is that enough to scare off lawyers from doing this in the future? perhaps. but remember, there is a lot
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.