Print
San Diego’s collective real estate portfolio is worth more than ever before, thriving instead of dying during a pandemic that introduced chaos and uncertainty into the market.
Tuesday, the San Diego County Assessor’s Office reported the assessed value of all taxable property in the county in 2021, as of Jan. 1, grew to a record-setting $627.25 billion. The sum includes residential, commercial and industrial land, and represents an increase of 3.72 percent over 2020. It also reflects property tax reductions for values affected by COVID-19 government restrictions.
The $22.5 billion, year-over-year bump in the county-wide property values, while less pronounced than last year’s 5.18 percent jump, continues the upward trajectory of the region’s expanding valuation following the Great Recession. The most values ever went up was in 2005, at the height of the housing boom, when the value of taxable property increased 13.3 percent.
A little rain and wind couldn t scare lovebirds away from tying the knot at San Diego County s COVID-cautious makeshift marriage hut Friday morning.
NBC 7 cameras caught several couples hoping the Chinese New Year and Year of the Ox would bring good fortune to their new marriage.
Newlyweds Yvonne and Mohammed met online. After two years of dating and three months of an engagement, the pair decided they just didn’t want to wait any longer.
“We actually wanted a big wedding,” said Mohammed. “But COVID kind of slowed us down so we just decided to do it with our family and a couple of friends.”
zero. right. they got it wrong. i have to say this about it, the reporter is extremely meticulous thorough reporter. i m very surprised that some of the facts. he says, the new york times said that came from the san diego county assessor s office. not an excuse. they are explaining where it came from. erroneous information that you got from the sources you trust is not. they made the correction but said here is what the information. but the question, should they retract the story and not offer a slow-mationing taking back pieces of it. i think he should be called formerly known meticulous and careful reporter. not currently. issa communication operation center did a great job of this. they even caught most interestingly of all an alleged incident of plagiarism against the fellow named lee bang who worked for the center
zero. right. they got it wrong. i have to say this about it, the reporter is extremely meticulous thorough reporter. i m very surprised that some of the facts. he says, the new york times said that came from the san diego county assessor s office. not an excuse. they are explaining where it came from. erroneous information that you got from the sources you trust is not. they made the correction but said here is what the information. but the question, should they retract the story and not offer a slow-mationing taking back pieces of it. i think he should be called formerly known meticulous and careful reporter. not currently. issa communication operation center did a great job of this. they even caught most interestingly of all an alleged incident of plagiarism against the fellow named lee bang who worked for the center