put in order necessarily by date. we have multiple copies of things. and so merely having something like that be provided to us i don t believe is indicative of anything in and of itself. if we had had an opportunity to actually interview some of these people, and that s not going to occur because of the fifth amendment arguments that have been made, it s very difficult to tie that together. you re sitting on this committee. here is an example. we have wildstein/kelly texts. kelly is fighting, turning over anything to this committee. possibly if she did turn over documents to the committee we would get a lot more context to this exchange and we might learn if there was a meeting between the governor and david samson. do you want her to be releasing these documents? are you glad the committee is taking her to court to try to as a member of the committee, i think it s important that we get the full picture, that we investigate and try to
lot, and governor christie. and wildstein, the command was only turn over documents that are relative to the lane closur closures. so in turk this over, wildstein is strongly hinting, is strongly suggesting that this attempted meeting or this possible meeting that may have taken place between the governor and david samson is related to the closure. one thing you have to believe is either this meeting didn t take place, there was no this is a red herring, there was no christie/samson meeting, or the meeting took place and a week before the time for l some traffic problems e-mail went out from bridget kelly, the subject never came up at all. this is one of the great mysteries in all of this. sitting on the committee and actu actually reviewing a lot of these documents, it s very difficult to put a lot of what we have received into any sort of context because what you re talking is dumps of thousands of pages of documents that aren t
e-mail. we know that meeting apparently happened because of text messages subpoenaed from david wildstein, told to turn over records that are relevant to the lane closure. so by turning over those texts, he is suggesting that the christie/samson meeting had something to do with the closures. again, there are far more questions than answers here. even if undermining sokolich s prize redevelopment program was part of the scheme, we don t know why he was targeted or if there was someone else, someone bigger at stake at the heart of this. weigh still don t know who would have been involved. documents haven t told us that story. we do know the biggest project ever undertake nen ft. lee, that had huge economic ramifications was affected by the closures. was on so can kolich s mind during the closures and could have been significantly altered if those closures had remained in place for good. this affected more than just the