present for the last time. viss chair lam? present. alonso? present. me lawyerlara. present and not sure it s for the last time. mondejar? present. pilpel? present. member schreiber. present. member tidwell. there s your core mr. chairman. to welcome public comments on the minutes before we approve them. without objection with the usual gruff dra matt cal, minutes so approved. moving to item number three, reprufle of the remaining task force minutes. as you all know we have been meeting fever issuely, there are a number of minutes from a number of meetings that our clerk has not had a report to for approval. and so i entertain a motion to that end that we would delegate again final review and approval authority to the chair for the april 4, april 5, april 9, april 11 and april 14th meetings entertain the motion. so moved. is there a second? second. public comment on this item? hearing none. is this something that we can do? i m not fa
that said, we will take the necessary time to deliberate appropriately. so with that, we will call to order the final meeting of the redistricting task meeting. role call please. chair macdonnell? present for the last time. viss chair lam? present. alonso? present. me lawyerlara. present and not sure it s for the last time. mondejar? present. pilpel? present. member schreiber. present. member tidwell. there s your core mr. chairman. to welcome public comments on the minutes before we approve them. without objection with the usual gruff dra matt cal, minutes so approved. moving to item number three, reprufle of the remaining task force minutes. as you all know we have been meeting fever issuely, there are a number of minutes from a number of meetings that our clerk has not had a report to for approval. and so i entertain a motion to that end that we would delegate again final review and approval authority to the chair for the april 4, april 5,
turnout was relative and a different districts and then for the rest of the meetings, i am not sure on the number. it is confusing, but maybe an average of center city, said center turned out so that there is sort of a quantifiable feeling on how successful the participation was in the various super of restorvisorial distric. thank you, sir. chris bowen, members of the elections task force 1995. you guys is by an hour and 10 minutes. a long this meeting we had was 5.5 hours. so congratulations. you have more stamina than i do. a couple of just general comments on timing. because the public financing for supervisors, the filing deadline for candidates will be earlier in the future. additionally, you worked backwards or forwards or whatever way you are going. and you go back to signatures of lieu. in many cases, you ll be probably needing, and i agree with member pilpel, you might have to get the report up by march 1 or 15th to provide adequate information because people do
good morning everyone, we re going to get start momently. for those who have been engaged in the process, please be sure secondly we want to ensure if you are intending to use the overhead to project, as you come forward hand your materials to our clerk and she will distribute them to us. and lastly, i guess i want to do this before we call the meeting to order. based on my conversation with the sheriff s department down stairs, there are a number of theories on how long this meeting will take. i would assume there s an over/under somewhere, bets going on. i ve heard noon, i ve heard 2:00. i ve heard someone say well i have enough food that will last until midnight. so it will be our goal to be not have that food used and be concluded long before midnight. that said, we will take the necessary time to deliberate appropriately. so with that, we will call to order the final meeting of the redistricting task meeting. role call please. chair macdonnell?
introduced this legislation. this is a sign you probably have read about. a number of articles have been read about it written about it. the importance is we spoke to many people in our community and it became very clear that this sign, indeed, as a historic character to the neighborhoods, that it has been an important part of the neighborhood for decades. in reviewing the existing law that addresses these issues, and i do want to thank director ram and his staff for their help throughout this process, it became clear the current law does not allow for the kind of case we have before us, were we have a sign that had historic or commemorative volume, but was not in the historic district. so how do you protect a sign that clearly has importance in a community from being removed? so, the legislation not only tries to address this specific situation that is before us, but also tries to create a mechanism so that there if there are similar situations and other parts of the cit