there is no real consequence to the bad behavior here. there are three things that are real clear . there was never a basis for russian collusion that the country went through three years to joe biden was in the know. that s a very importan2 t k noour current president was in a the know. how do we know that termlsaugush reveals that in august he gota e a briefing on the intercept of clinton allegedly approvingn al a plan to hang a russianle sink on donald trump tower. iplann the noas early on . all these years, he s been quiet about that. and third, no consequence. why is that important? just a few minutes ago, i reported some new bad rep behavior. the irs whistleblower ind, the bide n case has been takenth his off the case along with this whole team. his lawyerm his contacted congrs tonight, says this looks like retaliation. why would someone be temptede be to do that? t do twould mike morell be tempted to write the letter in 202ha0, misconstruing the laptop as russian disinformation?
forensicjournalism that protects the eyes and ears of the world? what the eyes and ears of the world? why is al a the eyes and ears of the world? why is at a further the eyes and ears of the world? why is al a further risk the eyes and ears of the world? why is al a further risk was shallow because this technology is so much more sophisticated. so we will not know it is a bad actor? sorry, it has read everything on the internet. it knows how to deceive you. it can be used at scale. if you converge social media technology with the idea that this technology can create content, in the hands of a bad actor who maybe wants to sway an election or spread misinformation about vaccines, can you imagine the scale at which these people will be able to do that? and geoffrey hinton, the godfather of artificial intelligence, recently left google and we should heed his advice in other areas also so if this technology is used at scale, what does that mean in terms of the displacement ofjobs and ski
of all of our lives. in the last 2a hours, google unveiled plans to introduce ai into its search engine. the software will automatically craft answers to open ended questions. this follows a wave of recent announcements from rival tech firms about their own advancements with al, which many believe could quickly revolutionise the way we all live and work. such rapid technological advancement brings new challenges and questions over how best to regulate. is the ai boom an opportunity to be seized on, a chance for economic growth and fresh thinking? could it, at the same time, be a risk to parts of life we all hold dear? the european parliament was today debating new eu legislation to restrict ai, following the lead of other countries, including china. here in the uk, the government s taken a different approach. we ll discuss all of this in a moment. first, here s kate. it has been described as the ai arms race, a new wave of genus of artificial intelligence, which can produce pictures or
is trained on a date at making recommendations, you know, potentially offering decisions up, and that is not generating any content but it is producing recommendations and nudging you in a certain direction. the speed of ai is rapid, it is progressing rapidly. as that s been something we should be concerned about? because not all ai is equal, the positive cases like health care, deep mind managed to predict protein structures and how they unfold so we have sped up drug recovery discovery to combat malaria, resistance to antibiotics and i have seenin resistance to antibiotics and i have seen in education how you can use an ai system to predict how you learn, where you might struggle before you struggle to stop any change being stuck and doing better in your exams and outcomes in education. and outcomes in education. where there was positive, and outcomes in education. where there was positive, narrow- and outcomes in education. where there was positive, narrow cases i and outcomes