National Herald case: Subramanian Swamy delaying proceedings, Sonia, Rahul Gandhi tell court financialexpress.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from financialexpress.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Subramanian Swamy Delaying Proceedings: Sonia, Rahul Say Over National Herald Case
The court will further hear the matter on January 12.
PTI 23 December 2020 PTI PTI 2020-12-23T15:41:54+05:30 Subramanian Swamy Delaying Proceedings: Sonia, Rahul Say Over National Herald Case outlookindia.com 2020-12-23T16:13:51+05:30
Also read
Congress leaders Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Wednesday accused BJP MP Subramanian Swamy of delaying proceedings in the National Herald case, filed by him against them and others, by moving “totally vague application.
The Gandhis made the submission before the court while opposing an application filed by Swamy, seeking summoning of various documents and witnesses in the case.
Sonia Gandhi and her son Rahul Gandhi. File
| Photo Credit:
The Hindu
Sonia Gandhi and Rahul made the submission before the court while opposing an application filed by Subramanian Swamy, seeking summoning of various documents and witnesses in the case. Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday accused BJP MP Subramanian Swamy of delaying proceedings in the National Herald case, filed by him against them and others, by moving “totally vague” application.
The Gandhis made the submission before the court while opposing an application filed by Mr. Swamy, seeking summoning of various documents and witnesses in the case. The accused sought dismissal of the application saying it was not filed under relevant provisions.
NEW DELHI: Congress leaders Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Wednesday accused BJP MP Subramanian Swamy of delaying proceedings in the National Herald case, filed by him against them and others, by moving totally vague application.
The Gandhis made the submission before the court while opposing an application filed by Swamy, seeking summoning of various documents and witnesses in the case.
The accused sought dismissal of the application saying it was not filed under relevant provisions. The present application is liable to be dismissed being totally vague; tainted by inordinate delay and dilatory in nature, the counsel appearing for the accused said.
The present application is liable to be dismissed being totally vague; tainted by inordinate delay and dilatory in nature, ? the counsel appearing for the accused said.
It was incumbent upon Swamy to file an application under the appropriate provision setting out the list of witnesses, along with other specific details, whom he intended to examine, the counsel said. The present application is also liable to be dismissed as the present application does not conform to the relevant provision, ? the counsel told Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Sachin Gupta.
In reply to the application, the accused said that while it was the legal right of Swamy to submit a list of witnesses sought to be summoned by him, the court was not conducting a roving inquiry .