Is this the launch of a wider War In the Middle East . Iran fired some 180 ballistic Cruise Missiles at israel last night. Revenge, it says, the strikes on lebanon. For strikes on Lebanon And Israels killing of leaders of Armed Groups it supports. Translation if they remove their evil from this region, without a doubt these conflicts, these wars, these clashes will disappear completely. While most missiles were brought down by israels sophisticated air defence system, the entire population was told to stay in bomb shelters. Afterwards, inspecting the damage, many agreed with the prime minister that iran must pay the price. My feeling is that it was an attack, but we are very strong, we trust our army, that it will do and complete itsjob, and it will do whatever it takes to finish whatever it needs to finish what they started. Today, instead of getting ready for the upcoming jewish new year holiday, many israelis are cleaning up. Emergency restrictions have been eased, life looks largel
Horrific Of hamas. And after the horrific attack by hamas carried horrific attack by hamas carried out nearly a year ago today carried out nearly a year ago today the carried out nearly a year ago today the united states sent a clear today the united states sent a clear message to iran. Dont exploit clear message to iran. Dont exploit the situation in ways that exploit the situation in ways that would risk propelling the region that would risk propelling the region into a broader war. The Igc repeatedly ignored this warning. By encouraging and enabling warning. By encouraging and enabling the whole season yemen to disrupt enabling the whole season yemen to disrupt global Shipping And Launch to disrupt global Shipping And Launch attacks against israel, by supporting militant groups in syria by supporting militant groups in Syria And Iraq which repeatedly attacked american forces repeatedly attacked american forces engaged in the fight against isis, and by arming and encouraging hezbolla
to himself want to influence the election. it would only require that he essentially sake actions that do want to influence the election would do so. could you explain why his own intent would not be required? because it s quite clear what congress wants to do in the hatch act is address the situation with the political people tt the top of the executive branch agencies or members of congress, put pressure on people in the federal government to use their official position to influence elections. that s not appropriate use of official position and that was the whole point of the hatch act. we can t have a situation where an underlyngos and does something at the behest of a superior and is able to say, well, no hatch act violation because i didn t give a hoot about the election. that makes absolutely no sense. and jim comey in his letter to the fellow members of the fbi to his staff, sent to the fbi