concerned and so the russians would have been concerned at ukrainian forces using the dam concerned at ukrainian forces using the dam itself as a crossing. and this was the dam itself as a crossing. and this was always going to come into the firing this was always going to come into the firing line, you could argue. i think the firing line, you could argue. i think the the firing line, you could argue. i think the dam being destroyed, and the wider think the dam being destroyed, and the wider implications for those living the wider implications for those living south, for any potential military living south, for any potential military offensive on the ukrainian side, military offensive on the ukrainian side, for military offensive on the ukrainian side, for the safety implications of these side, for the safety implications of these are side, for the safety implications of these are parisian nuclear power plant these are parisian nuclear power plant further east,
use the inside lane which would have been the hard shoulder on smart motorways because they are petrified that there may be a broken down vehicle ahead so you are not getting that extra 25% capacity. and also when there is an incident on a smart motorway, because there is no hard shoulder have to close at least one lane, often two lanes which causes massive delays, not only to drivers but also to the emergency services getting through to an incident or a crash because there is no hard shoulder for crash because there is no hard shoulderfor the crash because there is no hard shoulder for the emergency services to go down and that again has its own safety implications. what we said in our letter to the prime minister last week is that they should also look at existing smart motorways, reinstate the hard shoulder but alongside it, run a hard hitting lane discipline campaign. there are too many drivers who hog the middle lane on the
not exist. the committee had new evidence, including some emails documenting concerns in the secret service. warnings by the secret service to the white house about dangerous that could occur on january 6th. but that s not the full documentation. and we have yet to hear in any sort of public testimony, let alone a legal proceeding officials and the secret service account for what was happening that day. and i think importantly, account for any political motivations or sympathies that there might have been among the former presidents detail for what might have been happening in and around the white house on january 6th. tali, there are political implications. safety implications. talk me through, though, the legal implications of a potential cover-up. well, there s substantive crimes. and then there are cover-ups, or what we call obstruction. and that so many of the potential criminal charges that we ve been talking about. whether in the context of january six, all the way over to
account for any political motivations or sympathies that there might have been among the former presidents detail for what might have been happening in and around the white house on january 6th. charlie, there are political implications. safety implications. talk me through, though, the legal implications of a potential cover-up. well, there s substantive crimes. and then there are cover-ups, or what we call obstruction. and that so many of the potential criminal charges that we ve been talking about. whether in the context of january six, all the way over to the mar-a-lago investigation. both the and regional crimes in the people who enabled them or try to thwart law enforcement from figuring out what was going on i think the implications are huge. david, you, red i m sure, the former presidents rambling. 14-page letter. i m sure you heard his