is not a permanent process. reporter: so you don t support that, is that what you re saying? again, we will have the conversations and lay out exactly what the principles look like over the next seven to ten days. right now our goal, our focus is making sure that the program gets taken care of with also coupling that with massive border security, interior enforcement, some of the specific things we probably would like to see into sanctuary cities, expedited removal, more immigration judges, supporting things like the raise act, those are things you ll see us focus on and talk more about in the coming days. hallie? reporter: the president said today he wanted the travel ban to be larger and more specific. why is he fighting for it if it s, in fact, too small, not tough enough and too broad? it s a step in the right direction. the president s travel executive order is motivated by national security. and every step we can take to protecting people in this country is a step we re g
we ll do that. hopefully you ll tune in. there have been a few questions asked this week and sean and i both said we would get back to you on. i want to address a couple of those now. monday sean was asked how we knew that the supreme court s ruling on the president s travel executive order was 9-0 when the case was when the decision was announced. in fact, the decision which stayed the lower court s injunction on the president s executive order for all affected individuals without a bona fide connection to a person or entity in the united states was unanimous on the point that the stay should be granted at least to that extent. three justices would have gone further and stayed the injunctions in full. no justice dissented on the point that the stay should be granted in part and no justice indicated that he or she did not participate in the decision. jennifer jacobs from bloomberg all asked about the imf projection about u.s. growth. this morning the commerce department revised first