think why this is impossible because this is important just to highlight this. what you re saying is the stand u.s. policy is we support two states for two different peoples and big part of that is a jerusalem is a final status issue, we re going to run a peace process, eventually both peoples will have their own independent states and peace. the declaration of jerusalem is being read by palestinians as a declaration that essentially the u.s. has given up on that project and now we have entered a new era and people should reconcile with that. thank you for joining me. i really appreciate it. thank you for having me. still to come, another democrat accused of sexual misconduct faces mounting calls for his resignation as leading republicans prepare to almost an accused child predator to the senate. the opposing responses ahead. and did republicans make a $300 billion mistake in their tax bill? that s thing one, thing two, next.
jerusalem, not only jerusalem, they consider the dome of the rock as the most important, the third basically most important holy site for all of them. but it s also a holy site for christians and not only christians, palestinians for christian internationally. that s why jerusalem is a hot spot. and this act by trump looks like a diplomatic arson as if this kind of vandalism strategy that has no sense when it comes to politics. it has no consideration. the only sense that it makes might be for some evangelicals and roy moore who is trying to basically he s trying to pander to his base. but my fear and this is the message that we are seeing with his foreign policy that is transactional. this is actually a payback for sheld whon gave him $35 billion. what we are seeing is american foreign policy bent towards the checkbooks of certain individuals who want to promote their kind of views of the words
i think what hoyer and pelosi are doing is walk a fine line between not saying that he shouldn t be impeached, but saying this is not a thing we should be talking about right now. there are more politically effective things for democrats to be talking about. the difference between a substantive case for it and a tactical one. the substantive case and the originalist case, al green actually mixes as do you, the idea that this was not seen as a criminal item in the constitution, this could be used as sort of politically or just malfeasance, and i thought of the argument you made today when i saw this tweet from a texas representative in response to the president s announcement of jerusalem, it turns out all along, we ve been watching in slow motion the process of trump starting world war iii. but of course that s the kind of tale risk that you talk about in the article is the thing that you fear most in thinking about removing him. it is not it is not even hyperbolic. this is the t
i want to remind our audience that in 2000, the he was not prime minister at that time, he was the leader of the opposition, took hundreds of soldiers and walked around the mosque. triggering the second most violent thing ever. once you touch these religious sites, it basically are playing with fire. so, so i should say there s reporting indicating obviously he s a very, he donates a lot to republicans, he donated to donald trump, super pacs. there were others as well, steve bannon. and one of the things here that is strange about this particular issue, there s been a lot of double speak from republicans and democrats on jerusalem forever. so you have all of these symbolic votes, the democrats will vote to move the capital to declare the unified, the unified capital. you even have, here s chuck schumer said that he told the weekly standard he advised trump to declare jerusalem as israel s undivided capital.
basically he s trying to pander to his base. but my fear and this is the message that we are seeing with his foreign policy that is transactional. this is actually a payback for sheld whon gave him $35 billion. what we are seeing is american foreign policy bent towards the checkbooks of certain individuals who want to promote their kind of views of the words that detached from reality. 20% of american shows only 20% consider this a good move. 80% of american jews and overwhelming majority of israeli thinks that this is this kind of policy unilateral decision will basically wreck the middle east and it will transform the conflict to a political one to a religious one. and if i think benghazi and what happened in the embassy there was a low point and a violent act, imagine this, with a bigger magnitude. and jerusalem once you touch that, this is the kind of reaction you will have.