the head teachers, teachers, social workers really coalescing around a child and getting back. i have even got the secretary of state for education leading on this, he has brought together the key people in social care to help with this. idistill social care to help with this. will the have social care to help with this. will they have the social care to help with this. will they have the resources to do it? social care to help with this. will. they have the resources to do it? i think this is about joining up they have the resources to do it? i think this is aboutjoining up so it is aboutjoining up so it is about joint and resources. the fact that so many schools are doing this really well and so many local authorities are, what we need to do is enable and yes, resource, to get the support that children need now and i am looking closely now at the detail plan to get this campaign to get every child back in. what i can tell you is, having been a teacher and head teacherfor 31 tell yo
of europe set up after the second world war and the uk is a member and it s got nothing to do with the european union. the high court in london had earlier ruled there was no reason to stop the flight but acknowledged there were serious issues with the rwanda policy. judges here will next month, through what s called a judicial review, consider whether the policy is legal. the plan, which will cost £120 million, was announced last month and will run for five years. scores of charities, campaign groups as well as the church of england oppose the policy which will see some asylum seekers given one way tickets to the east african country. a number have launched legal challenges. let s get the latest from mark lobel. going nowhere. borisjohnson s rwanda plan to cut immigration, grounded for now. this flight was originally meant to take over 100 asylum seekers to rwanda, then just a handful, and finally,
them to other countries. british ministers point showing - them to other countries. british ministers point showing this - them to other countries. british l ministers point showing this plan has got more supporters than it has opponents. it is popular. it is popular- opponents. it is popular. it is popular- i opponents. it is popular. it is popular. ithink opponents. it is popular. it is popular. i think that - opponents. it is popular. it 3 popular. i think that comes down to the way it has been phrased, the way it has been looked at. everyone wants to tackle channel crossing and make sure people are safe, the problem is this will not impact on trafficking with people because people who are traffic do not know which country they are coming to. they are exploited afterwards. they are paying smugglers. smugglers will inform the people they are smuggling what might happen, they are not telling them they will go to rwanda. in no does it actually impact. lode in no does it actually im
hello, good morning, welcome to bbc news. i m victoria derbyshire. here are your headlines at 9:003m. the government says the next asylum flight to rwanda is being prepared after a last minute injunction was granted last night which stopped the first flight yesterday. the government is surprised and disappointed by the ruling made last night. in my experience as a minister, it s the quickest time i ve ever known echr to consider a particular case. we still need to obviously go through that ruling, decide the next legal steps, but also prepare the next flight. what s your view of the government s rwanda plan will it deter others from making that perilous journey across the channel in a boat?
who are causing untold misery and untold costs to the british economy. the plan has not yet got off the ground, but is not dead. attention now turns to howjudges will rule when they examine the entire rwanda removals policy next month. mark lobel, bbc news. government minister therese coffey insisted the home office was determined to go ahead with the policy. i think the government is surprised and disappointed by the ruling made last night. in my experience as a minister, it is the quickest time i have ever known ehcr to consider a particular case. but nevertheless, it had been through british courts and that is why i think people will be surprised to learn that european judges are overturning britishjudges decisions. so there is an element here of we still need to obviously go through that ruling,