So disgraceful : Trump lashes out at publication of special counsel questions - William P J Lynch Jr com wpjljr.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from wpjljr.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Framing of a President, Leaks, Lies, and False Documents
Robert Mueller’s team or someone closely tied to them leaked to the New York Times the questions Mueller hopes to ask President Trump. The questions are open-ended softball questions meant to entrap for some process crime such as lying.
There are four dozen questions. Many of the questions concern James Comey, his friend, who connived to launch the probe on obstruction charges with Mueller in charge.
Many of these questions concern tweets which should not be part of a serious investigation. How is the President supposed to remember all this? The answer is he’s not. They want to accuse him of lying.
as for the white house, the president as you can well imagine has adroitly suggested that he wants to talk. i would just point to this, harris. if his tone on twitter is a window into his thinking, it s probably a good idea that he not avail himself to do that. he wrote this on twitter the russian witch hunt hoax started as the insurance policy long before i even got elected is very bad for our country. they are entrapping people from statements, lies, unrelated things that took place many years ago. nothing to do with collusion. a democrat scam. about which jim comey, who is, as mike emanuel party come is very busy this afternoon preeti tweeted this. this is the president of our country lying about a search warrant issued by a federal judge. shame on republicans who don t speak of at this moment. from the fbi, the rule of law, and the truth. of course, he s also referencing the dash.
after what bolton called the witch hunt of the mueller probe is over. does he know something that we don t know, that it definitely will be over next year? no. i don t think he does. but we never know. what we do know for sure, wolf, is that would be after the midterm elections. i think it has surprised to a degree the white house and the president s inner circle. how much blowback they ve gotten over this invitation to president putin and so why not put this out a few months, see if politics and circumstances change. as many people pointed out, john bolton, national security adviser bolton, has gone from someone who s been incredibly hawkish on russia to just sort of going with the flow of the administration. it s hard to predict where he s going with this. zbliem sure the optics of putin coming to the white house. not invited to capitol hill but to the white house before the election. the midterm elections. not necessarily great for republicans. stand by. there are new developments
trump. constitutionally has that s an open question. the department of justice has a policy against it. this would be in the context of an investigation. and that is as much a political matter as a legal matter. that said, the issue with obstruction of justice is always intent. was there criminal intent? was there an intent to corrupt? and there is no better way to determine someone s intent than their own words. and that s what these tweets are. they are the president s own words. and it is a perfectly appropriate and logical place for mueller to look to see whether there is criminal intent, to see whether there is an acknowledgment that the reason for the firing was improve. you know, mark preston, there s no shortage of examples of the president in this twitter feed going after what he calls the russia witch hunt, going after james comey, andrew mccabe, jeff sessions among others. but clearly the president doesn t seem to care. about that. he s going to continue doing