however, he didn t reveal the information he claimed to possess. caputo said he spoke with greenberg by phone and arranged a meeting for stone. text messages show that after the meeting caputo asked stone, how crazy is the russian? stone said, he wants big money for the information. waste of time. caputo replied, the russian way. anything at all interesting? and stone said, no. neither disclosed that testimony. he said he had no contact with russians. i spent my time in front of the committee detailing the fact i had no contact with russians. i never heard of anyone in the trump campaign talking with russians. but i never was asked questions about my time in russia that i never seen spoke to anybody in russia. i never heard the word russia and we did not use russian dressing.
now to a 2015 meeting between a trump associate and a russian op serative offering di on hillary clinton. not the same man, a new one. he offered incriminating information to the trump campaign for $2 million in 2016. a meeting setadvisor michael ca. i have never seen any documents. i spent my time detailing to the committee i ve never heard anyone in the trump campaign talking with russians but i was never asked questions about my time in russia. i never even spoke for anybody about russia. i never heard the word russia and we did not use russian dressing. that never doesn t really mean never. those men are saying they forgot that meeting because they didn t think it was really anything. they were suggesting it was a
well, the hj heinz company chk. heinz is taking mayonnaise and ketchup and turning it into mayo chup. the aspirationalism of mayonnaise, the individualism of ketchup, mayo chup, just rolls off the tongue, doesn t it? i guess. kecha naz. i ve heard of that combination before. of course, russian dressing, how did we not see it coming. it s been right in front of us all along. maybe collusion isn t so bad, at least when it comes to condiments. who doesn t like a nice ruben? so when you call it russian dressing or mayo chup. we like kecha naz, i think. whatever you like, just keep putin it on.
it s a me thinks you does protest too much. incredible. that was in essence the reason for the special counsel investigation. the report from the heart land is these words. maybe not the most intellectual words, but blah, blah, blah. this is what the folks in the heart land they re thinking about gun debate, tax cuts. what does that matter right now? does that matter to the investigation? well, my point simply is how it is playing politically. i m telling you when you hear bank fraud and ukraine and paul manafort and you put up all of those statistics, i m telling you how it plays in pea ore i can t, they re saying forget about it. to the point where this is why trump goes and talks about no collusion because look at those statistics you put. where is any of this? that s what he s saying. who knows. maybe they want to see if he s got russian dressing on his salad tonight. i don t know, they re trying to figure this out somehow. they re not doing it so far. what s your tak
what i told the house intelligence committee in july: i saw no russian colukas. lukas. collusion. i heard no talk of russia. we did not use russian dressing. this is a bogus investigation because hillary clinton needs an excuse for not going to morn and wisconsin. my family gets to pay for it. tucker: how much have had you to pay personally to respond to this? senate intelligence wants me for two years. and diane feinstein wants he. me. each hearing is $30,000. i will play legal fees that