road. the bus carrying university of washington marching band flipping on its side on its way to a game against washington state. 30 of the 56 people on board are injured but none are serious. that is the good news. rob: james comey is vowing to fight a subpoena to testify before congress behind closed doors but he claims he is happy to sit for the public. jillian: answers about the russia probe. reporter: the turn of eventss on thanksgiving the house judiciary committee wants to question james comay and loretto lynch about anti-trump bias at the fbi and doj during the 2016 election some i have affected their agencies when it came to the clinton email and trump russia collusion case. comey tweeted happy thanks giving, got a subpoena from house republicans. i am happy to sit in the light and answer all questions. i will resist a closed-door
presidential candidate. to speak of the group argues proportional allocation would encourage candidates to campaign across the country beyond this swing states. votes cast would not be discarded simply because the voter is not in the majority. for instance, in texas, nearly 4 million votes were cast for clinton, but all 38 electoral college votes want to trump. in massachusetts, trump did not collect any of the states and 11 electoral, though more than 1 million voted for him. massachusetts secretary of state william galvin is fighting the suit. many people for my party are frustrated by the fact of the popular vote winner is not the person sitting in the white house. but i think casting more uncertainty into the process by having this sort of a rational system of percentages and a weighted vote does not make any sense. speak of the plaintiffs hope to see the case reached the supreme court prior to the 2020 presidential election. mike? mike: molly line in massachusetts. thank you v
presidential election. comey tweeted this morning, confirming the subpoena, i will resist a closed door thing because i ve seen enough of their selected leaking and distortion. let s have a hearing and invite everyone to see. an attorney for comey said the subpoena is a way to promote a false narrative, calling it a political stunt, adding mr. comey and comey embraces and welcomes a hearing up into the public, but the subpoena issued yesterday represent an abuse of process. a divergence from house rules and its presumption of transparency. republicans have wanted to talk to comey and went to determine if there was any anti-trump bias that affected their agencies when it came to the client an email case and so trump-russia collusion case. comey has previously offered to testify as long as it was public, a sentiment shared by many democrats. others have questioned the last-minute nature of these subpoenas. the idea there is this 11th hour subpoena about things that happened years
york times and other places, this is fake news. i m not upset. but then he s rage tweeting. isn t that proving exactly your reporting? every time he says fake news, we get more subscribers. he encourage him to keep doing that. every time he sees a story he doesn t like, it s fake news. it s an utterly meaningless phrase at this point. these questions, reportedly only deal with things from before the election, right? which would mean they had nothing to do with possible obstruction of jutsd. so where do you think that stands now? well, i am one of the many people who thinks that mueller made a strategic decision abouting whether to press the obstruction case or just focus on the russia collusion case. but eve so, i think what trump fears is that the people around him like roger stone, jerome corsi and others who were involved in the campaign are the people who are by their own words likely to face indictments soon in connection with
isn t that proving exactly your reporting? i think every time he says fake news, we get more subscribers. i d encourage him to keep doing that. every time he sees a story he doesn t like, it s fake news. it s an utterly meaningless phrase at this point. these questions, reportedly only deal with things from before the election, right? which would mean they had nothing to do with possible obstruction of justice. so where do you think that stands now? well, i am one of the many people who thinks that mueller made a strategic decision about whether to press the obstruction case or just focus on the russia collusion case. but even so, i think what trump fears is that the people around him like roger stone, jerome corsi and others who were involved in the campaign are the people who are by their own words likely to face indictments soon in connection with collusion with russia. so trump s main story over the last 18 months that there s been no collusion proved is exactly