News coverage is provided. News coverage is provided. For dhs s decision to rescind daca, it fails to elaborate meaningfully on the agencies primary rationale for the decision. The judgment that the policy was unlawful and unconstitutional. He goes on to say while the memo offers several additional Policy Grounds for daca rescission, most of these simply repackage legal arguments previously made. And insufficiently independent from the Agencies Evaluation of daca legality to preclude review work to support the agencies decision. An earlier opinion the court did not say dhs lacks the Constitutional Authority to rescind the program and he says it is not with this ruling either but if dhs wants to rescind the program, they have to give a rational explanation for their decision. Saying, the last guy did it wrong is in in adequate. Doing so probably amounted to criminal activity. She admitted she had a sense that manafort lied to her about where money be transferred into his Political Consu
of the president sitting down with mueller. i think the president is more than open. he is raring to talk to mueller. that is obvious because he looks to overrule what his lawyers are telling him. defense lawyers almost always counsel the clients not to testify in court or give more information to authorities unless it is absolutely necessary. look at trumps tweets in public statements. it s good that he views these as bogus and wants to fight them. whether that is the best legal strategy is open. but that is something he personally wants to do. blake: one issue is the rush occlusion case and if there s an obstruction of justice, and whether the president would answer questions with robert mueller verbally versus writing them down, written questions. that would be on the issue of obstruction of justice. is at the crossroads?
the past and history, that they ve gone beyond guardrails in the past with respect what information they can give you. here is a deputy attorney general a few weeks ago talking about this idea that he could potentially be impeached. i can tell you the people who have been making threats privately and publicly against me for quite some time. i think they should understand by now the department of justice is not going to be extorted. shannon: they say they are turning over information. is it quantity or quality? why haven t they turned over the information about how cross fire hurricane started, the trump-rush occlusion case that was opened by peter strzok who said they were going to stop trump and that you needed an insurance policy. very simple to do that. why am the given us the answers about whether the fbi or obama justice department did anything to induce any type of surveillance or spying on trump s campaign prior to july 31, 2016. those are very simple questions. they eithe